Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Different implementation of activation normalization from the one described in the paper. #114

Open
shuohantao opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Different implementation of activation normalization from the one described in the paper. #114

shuohantao opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@shuohantao
Copy link

In the paper, actnorm is guaranteed to be invertible as long as the learned vector s contains non-zero element. The code implementation doesn't guarantee invertability. I wonder why the actual implementation is different.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@shuohantao