Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Android 9 builds for x86 & x86_64 are broken #255

Open
greyltc opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Android 9 builds for x86 & x86_64 are broken #255

greyltc opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@greyltc
Copy link

greyltc commented Apr 8, 2020

Those builds fail with the following error:

[642/718] including vendor/opengapps/build/modules/ActionsServices/Android.mk ...
zipinfo:  cannot find or open , .zip or .ZIP.
tools/test/connectivity/Android.mk: error: ActionsServices: No source files specified 
build/make/core/prebuilt_internal.mk:35: error: done.
16:07:25 ckati failed with: exit status 1

#### failed to build some targets (46 seconds) ####

This happens because there is no ActionsServices blob in the all, x86 or x86_64 repos here: https://gitlab.opengapps.org/opengapps but vendor/opengapps/build/modules/ActionsServices/Android.mk somehow still gets included even if you have GAPPS_EXCLUDED_PACKAGES += ActionsServices

This PR fixes the problem for me: #222
@greyltc greyltc changed the title Android 9 builds for x86 are broken Android 9 builds for x86 & x86_64 are broken Apr 8, 2020
greyltc referenced this issue Apr 8, 2020
@stefanhh0 @acr92
Prefer ARCH specific prebuilt APKs
f8bd617 
The prebuilt APKs in the ARCH folder (e.g. arm64) should be preferred
over the prebuilt APKs in the all folder.
@greyltc greyltc mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2020
Open
@tugapower0 tugapower0 mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2020
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@greyltc