Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: offlinedatasci: A Python Package for Managing Data Science Software Installers when Limited Access to the Internet is Anticipated #249

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @garezana (Virnaliz Cruz)
Repository: https://github.com/carpentriesoffline/offlinedatasci/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.5.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e102d1ec7a25908cff5c2bc339c540e"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e102d1ec7a25908cff5c2bc339c540e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e102d1ec7a25908cff5c2bc339c540e/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/5e102d1ec7a25908cff5c2bc339c540e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @garezana. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@garezana if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (1425.4 files/s, 105805.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         4            125              0            434
Python                           5             94             96            377
TeX                              1             20              0            117
YAML                             4             13              5            103
TOML                             1              8              0             55
R                                1              6              3             39
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
reStructuredText                 3             16             24             26
JSON                             1              0              0             17
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            22            294            136           1203
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   113	Ethan White
    55	Virnaliz Cruz
     9	[garezana]
     6	Jannetta Steyn
     4	Abhishek Dasgupta
     2	Ethan White (he/him)
     2	Heather Turner
     1	Colin Sauze

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Sphinx documentation
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Data Science
- No DOI given, and none found for title: People in Low-Income Households Have Less Access t...
- 10.32614/cran.package.minicran may be a valid DOI for title: miniCRAN: Create a Mini Version of CRAN Containing...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The World Factbook, Internet users
- No DOI given, and none found for title: python-pypi-mirror
- No DOI given, and none found for title: importlib-resources
- No DOI given, and none found for title: airium
- No DOI given, and none found for title: beautifulsoup4
- No DOI given, and none found for title: requests
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Python 3 Reference Manual
- No DOI given, and none found for title: GNU Wget
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Jupyter Notebooks ? a publishing format for reprod...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R
- 10.32614/cran.package.remotes may be a valid DOI for title: remotes: R Package Installation from Remote Reposi...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Comp...

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2420

🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

@ethanwhite
Copy link

A few notes on the editorialbot's checks:

  1. There is a Statement of Need section, it's just titled Introduction and Statement of Need since the section covers both. Let us know if we need to figure out how to separate them.
  2. Most of the missing DOI's are for things that don't have DOI's. The CRAN citations do have them now and we'll add them during revision.

Suggested reviewers:

  • Sarah Masud (sara-02) - Probably the best reviewer on the JOSE list due to interest in offline tools and experience with Python
  • John Ray (johnlray) - Also on the JOSE list and has an interest in web scraping (which this package does a lot of) and experience with Python
  • Angelique Trusler (elletjies) Not on the JOSE list, but a good reviewer given experience organizing training in internet-limited environments

Some other folks on the JOSE list with experience in Python and teaching:

  • Kristian Rother (krother)
  • Ariel Roke (arokem)

Let us know if there's anything else we can do or provide to help with the review process.

@ethanwhite
Copy link

I'm following up to see if there is anything else we can provide to help move this review forward

@ethanwhite
Copy link

Hi - following up on this again. We originally submitted this paper in May of 2024 and it would be really helpful if the review process could get started soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants