-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Miet: an R package for region of interest analysis from magnetic reasonance images #1842
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1842 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:in |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1842 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:in |
👋 @arfon - I'm a bit confused about what the error is here - is this related to the figure? Perhaps you can help? (and maybe open a whedon issue related to better error message?) |
@danielskatz - I think this is because the URL at the top can't be cloned by Git. It needs changing to |
👋 @benoit-combes - Please change the paper.md as @arfon suggests, then enter a new comment here with |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@danielskatz - just to clarify, the URL for the repo needed editing at the top of the issue (I've done this). |
ah, sorry, I thought you meant in the paper.md - How did this wrong URL get in? User error in the submission form? |
Yeah, it was an error in the submission form. I've opened an issue to track this (openjournals/whedon#60) |
May I suggest @neuroimaginador that appears to gather expertise in R, data analysis and neuroimaging (that are relevant for the paper) for reviewing ? |
@whedon commands |
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
|
@whedon list editors |
Current editors:
|
May I suggest @arokem as editor ? |
Yes. I can edit this. |
@whedon assign arokem as editor |
OK, the editor is arokem |
👋 @neuroimaginador : would you be willing to review this paper for JOSS? |
@brechmos : would you be willing to review this paper for JOSS?
…On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 7:47 AM Arfon Smith ***@***.***> wrote:
@arokem <https://github.com/arokem> @brechmos
<https://github.com/brechmos> (who's here at STScI) might be a good
additional reviewer.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1842?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAA46NXVLT6JYNXQRAERDZDQRLVY3A5CNFSM4JGIBTKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECYBOPA#issuecomment-548411196>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA46NRSLTMWCII2PAIKZA3QRLVY3ANCNFSM4JGIBTKA>
.
|
👋 @janfreyberg : would you be willing to review this paper for JOSS? You are one of the only people among our reviewer pool who are neuro-savvy and also R-literate, so it would be a great help. |
@arokem yes, of course! |
Wonderful. Thank you! I will assign you first, and then stand by until I find another reviewer and kick off the review for this. |
@whedon assign @janfreyberg as reviewer |
OK, the reviewer is @janfreyberg |
Hello, I'd like to review this work!!
El jue., 31 oct. 2019 15:17, Ariel Rokem <[email protected]>
escribió:
… 👋 @neuroimaginador <https://github.com/neuroimaginador> : would you be
willing to review this paper for JOSS?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1842?email_source=notifications&email_token=AH6U472UD4VIWXARMAYNRYLQRLSHNA5CNFSM4JGIBTKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECX56KI#issuecomment-548396841>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH6U47YVKKVDSZNFMHJUEITQRLSHNANCNFSM4JGIBTKA>
.
|
Thanks @neuroimaginador ! You are on! |
@whedon add @neuroimaginador as reviewer |
OK, @neuroimaginador is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #1862. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Alright, @janfreyberg and @neuroimaginador, please head over to #1862 for your reviewer check-lists. Feel free to tag me into issues, if you have any questions, as you work through this. I'll close this now. Thanks again! |
Submitting author: @benoit-combes (Benoit Combès)
Repository: https://gitlab.inria.fr/miet/miet
Version: 0.1.0
Editor: @arokem
Reviewers: @janfreyberg, @neuroimaginador
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @benoit-combes. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@benoit-combes if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: