-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: EndoMineR for the extraction of endoscopic and associated pathology data from medical reports #701
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @arfon it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper 🎉. ⭐ Important ⭐ If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿 To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #701 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
Accepting because of ropensci/software-review#153 |
@sebastiz - a couple of things:
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #701 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #701 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #701 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #701 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #701 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #701 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@arfon
I have now proofed the pdf and uploaded to zenodo.
Two questions: Do I put the DOI on the ReadMe for the package
I uploaded a copy of the software from a forked version in my repository as the software is now under rOpenSci and zenodo wouldnt link to that. Is that the correct way to do it?
The DOI is:
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1232059
…________________________________
From: Arfon Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: 25 April 2018 16:39
To: openjournals/joss-reviews
Cc: Gastroenterology Data Science; Mention
Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [REVIEW]: EndoMineR for the extraction of endoscopic and associated pathology data from medical reports (#701)
@sebastiz<https://github.com/sebastiz> - a couple of things:
1. Could you please take a look at the PDF compilation errors above? If you push changes to https://github.com/ropensci/EndoMineR then you can ask Whedon to try and compile the paper with @whedon generate pdf
2. Once the paper compiles properly, please make an archive of the reviewed software in Zenodo/figshare/other service and update this thread with the DOI of the archive?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#701 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJHXPaN06wz4_Eb3OIavEOhPZrMC9dRZks5tsKangaJpZM4Tjwmr>.
|
@arfon
Sorry.... My last question is how do I get the paper registered on pubmed?
Thanks
Sebastian Zeki
…________________________________
From: Arfon Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: 25 April 2018 16:39
To: openjournals/joss-reviews
Cc: Gastroenterology Data Science; Mention
Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [REVIEW]: EndoMineR for the extraction of endoscopic and associated pathology data from medical reports (#701)
@sebastiz<https://github.com/sebastiz> - a couple of things:
1. Could you please take a look at the PDF compilation errors above? If you push changes to https://github.com/ropensci/EndoMineR then you can ask Whedon to try and compile the paper with @whedon generate pdf
2. Once the paper compiles properly, please make an archive of the reviewed software in Zenodo/figshare/other service and update this thread with the DOI of the archive?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#701 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJHXPaN06wz4_Eb3OIavEOhPZrMC9dRZks5tsKangaJpZM4Tjwmr>.
|
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.1232059 as archive |
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.1232059 is the archive. |
@sebastiz - your paper is now accepted into JOSS and your DOI is https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00701 ⚡️:rocket: :boom: |
I'm not sure what the current status of this. I know some of our editors were working on this over in openjournals/joss#153 |
🎉🎉🎉 Congratulations on your paper acceptance! 🎉🎉🎉 If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippet:
This is how it will look in your documentation: We need your help! Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
|
Submitting author: @sebastiz (Sebastian Zeki)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/EndoMineR
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @arfon
Reviewer: @arfon
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.1232059
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@arfon, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @arfon know.
Review checklist for @arfon
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: