You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a setup with three machines. One machine I'll refer to as the sender, and two other machine are the receivers. The sender frequently sends incremental snapshots to both receivers. I upgraded one of the receiving hosts to openzfs 2.1.1 and after a week with no issues, upgraded the second receiver to version 2.1.1, which is where I started experiencing a problem sending incremental snapshosts on some datasets.
When sending to one of the receivers, I get the following error when sending incremental snapshosts:
cannot receive incremental stream: incremental send stream requires -L (--large-block), to match previous receive.
The recordsize for the dataset in question is 1M on all three hosts.
The receiving zpool with no issues is reporting the large_blocks feature as 'enabled' as opposed to 'active', where incremental sends for some datasets are failing. Could this be the problem?
I don't want to lose any data, read that there are some issues with using the -L flag. Any ideas? Thanks.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I have a setup with three machines. One machine I'll refer to as the sender, and two other machine are the receivers. The sender frequently sends incremental snapshots to both receivers. I upgraded one of the receiving hosts to openzfs 2.1.1 and after a week with no issues, upgraded the second receiver to version 2.1.1, which is where I started experiencing a problem sending incremental snapshosts on some datasets.
When sending to one of the receivers, I get the following error when sending incremental snapshosts:
cannot receive incremental stream: incremental send stream requires -L (--large-block), to match previous receive.
The
recordsize
for thedataset
in question is1M
on all three hosts.The receiving zpool with no issues is reporting the
large_blocks
feature as 'enabled' as opposed to 'active', where incremental sends for some datasets are failing. Could this be the problem?I don't want to lose any data, read that there are some issues with using the
-L
flag. Any ideas? Thanks.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions