Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[epic] Add retry limits and a new reason to the Progressing status condition that is present when retry limit is reached. #1440

Open
everettraven opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
epic v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0 v1.1

Comments

@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

As part of the v1 API stabilization effort, a few of us (@joelanford @grokspawn @LalatenduMohanty and I) identified that it would be a better user experience if the Progressing condition when set to True was considered a "happy" state where generally everything is okay and we are actively attempting to progress towards a future state OR are at the desired state and ready to progress towards any future desired states. We felt that Retrying is currently a mix of a "sad" and "happy" reason but is generally more reflective of "we encountered a hiccup in progressing" as opposed to requiring user intervention.

In an effort to make the Retrying reason be considered "happier", it was concluded that it would be best to add some form of a retry limit that when reached would result in the Progressing condition being set to False with a reason along the lines of RetryLimitExceeded to signal to users that the ClusterExtension/ClusterCatalog is no longer in a "happy" state.

@joelanford joelanford added this to OLM v1 Nov 8, 2024
@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty added the v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0 label Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
epic v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0 v1.1
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants