We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
They were in 2018 (~2.5 years ago) so it is important to see how this has evolved. Also the reproduced result link is broken https://nextjournal.com/sdanisch/fastr-benchmark
Ideally the benchmarks would be done on the latest openjdk 16 (but turning on parallel GC instead of G1 would be fair)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @LifeIsStrange, the new results are located here https://www.graalvm.org/r/ - measured on GraalVM 21.2.0. They are new measurements from the same functions and packages described at https://medium.com/graalvm/faster-r-with-fastr-4b8db0e0dceb. The reproducibility is a bit tricky, though, as we do not have approvals to publish certain packages used in the measurements.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
They were in 2018 (~2.5 years ago) so it is important to see how this has evolved.
Also the reproduced result link is broken
https://nextjournal.com/sdanisch/fastr-benchmark
Ideally the benchmarks would be done on the latest openjdk 16 (but turning on parallel GC instead of G1 would be fair)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: