You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2020. It is now read-only.
In the case of Wegenregister, these are interesting attribute comparisons:
Straatnaam (LSTRNM & RSTRNM)
Morfologie van de weg (LBLMORF) (autostrade, rijweg, fietspad, aardeweg,…)
Status (LBLSTATUS) (in gebruik of niet in gebruik – eigenlijk gewoon filteren dat jullie enkel rekening houden met “in gebruik”)
Toegangsbeperking (LBLTGBEP) (prive of openbaar)
Wegcategorie: (LBLWEGCAT)
A bit hardee to access attributes:
In AttWegverharding: LBLTYPE (verhard of onverhard)
In AttRijstroken: LBLRICHT (indicatie van eenrichtingsstraten)
We need good source data, and for now it seems that only Nevele will put their hand in the fire about their data quality. We're in touch with their GIS responsible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the case of Wegenregister, these are interesting attribute comparisons:
A bit hardee to access attributes:
We need good source data, and for now it seems that only Nevele will put their hand in the fire about their data quality. We're in touch with their GIS responsible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: