[docs] Fix grammar in CONTRIBUTING.md

[NikitaZotov]

• Read PR documentation
• Update changelog
• Update documentation

---

Important

Fixes grammar in CONTRIBUTING.md under the Pull Request Review section for clarity.

• Documentation:
  • Fixes grammar in CONTRIBUTING.md under the Pull Request Review section.
  • Changes include correcting verb forms and punctuation for clarity.

^{This description was created by for 6455023. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 6455023 in 43 seconds

More details

• Looked at 18 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 7 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. docs/CONTRIBUTING.md:110

• Draft comment:
  Good grammar corrections in the Pull Request Review section. Changes are clear and improve readability.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. docs/CONTRIBUTING.md:110

• Draft comment:
  Good improvement in the grammar for the review section; the subject–verb agreements and phrasing are now consistent.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. docs/CONTRIBUTING.md:1

• Draft comment:
  Line 1: "This page describes rules to contribute changes and features by Pull Requests creating." is awkwardly phrased. Consider rephrasing to something like "This page describes the rules for contributing changes and features via Pull Requests."
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

4. docs/CONTRIBUTING.md:64

• Draft comment:
  Line 64: "Each commit in Pull Request should be an atomic." is grammatically incorrect. Consider using "Each commit in a Pull Request should be atomic." or "Each commit should be an atomic commit."
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

5. docs/CONTRIBUTING.md:76

• Draft comment:
  Line 76: "Each commit should have not much differences excluding cases, with:" is awkward. Consider revising to "Each commit should not have many differences, except in cases such as:".
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. docs/CONTRIBUTING.md:81

• Draft comment:
  Line 81: "Do atomic commits for each changes." should be corrected to "Do atomic commits for each change."
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

7. docs/CONTRIBUTING.md:94

• Draft comment:
  Line 94: "Each Pull Request with many changes, that not possible to review (excluding codestyle, rename changes), will be rejected." could be improved. Consider revising to "Any Pull Request with many changes that are not possible to review (excluding codestyle or rename changes) will be rejected."
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_NhnRXmkFnLRUYPbh

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.