Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proofreading? #57

Open
piyushmishra12 opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Proofreading? #57

piyushmishra12 opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@piyushmishra12
Copy link
Member

I was going through the official website and keeping aside the minor grammatical mistakes, I found many statements which if rephrased would read much better and the meaning will remain the same. I'm sure there is some amount of proofreading done for the website, be it the main content or the members' profiles, but these minor flaws irked me a little. Just a thought.

@palash25
Copy link
Contributor

proofreading done for the website,

not really we were only focussed on following git best practices.

be it the main content

for the main content even I see some flaws so you can go ahead and make a PR for that you have my permission but just the main content not the profiles.

@p-society/2020-batch @p-society/2019-batch @p-society/2021-batch we need permissions from all members to correct grammatical errors on their profiles.

@itsmepiyush2 can you give us a few examples of these errors. You can start with my profile if you want 😛

@piyushmishra12
Copy link
Member Author

piyushmishra12 commented Aug 18, 2018

Ignoring the trivial errors like 'space before a full stop' and 'no space after a comma', there are some sentences which could really read better if rephrased. The examples that I give may not be grammatically incorrect but I have just a few suggestions to make them look better.
e.g. from @palash25 bhaiya's profile:

"Most of my time is spent hacking on open source. I have contributed to coala, duckduckgo, Kinto, OpenGenus,Mozilla and the Ethereum foundation.
I also like to write articles and have written for opensource.com and geeksforgeeks.org in the past. I also maintain a list of links to all my articles just in case you are interested."

Since both the paragraphs talk about interests and experience, I'd suggest you merge the two. Moreover the opening sentence in the second paragraph has an also in it which is incorrect. A better paragraph could be:

"Most of my time is spent hacking on open source. I have made contributions to coala, duckduckgo, Kinto, OpenGenus, Mozilla and the Ethereum foundation. Moreover, I am also very fond of writing articles. I have prior experience in content writing for opensource.com and geeksforgeeks.org. For those interested, I maintain a list of links to all my articles."

Some minor errors right off the bat: "I am a the head of..." and "I've have..."

I think it is important for me to reiterate that these are not very grave errors and things can be managed if these are done away with. However, speaking from an outsider's perspective, I'm sure these changes will help make the website look more professional and people will take it more seriously. I do have experience in proofreading and content writing, and I'm just conveying what I learnt there.

@palash25
Copy link
Contributor

palash25 commented Aug 18, 2018

You can edit my profile and main content (both will be separate PRs). Go ahead. And thanks for pointing it out, I submitted my profile in a hurry but never read it out loud.

I'm sure these changes will help make the website look more professional and people will take it more seriously

Agreed.

I do have experience in proofreading and content writing,

Also if you have any ideas for articles that we can publish on our medium account let us know.

@shivank01
Copy link
Member

@itsmepiyush2 Also in achivements section it is written "National University of". Change it to "National University of Singapore".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants