-
Hi! I’m a regular user of both click and devdocs.io – I feel it would be great to have your documentation be integrated on there to make it more practically searchable offline. Essentially, that service scrapes docs periodically, reformats them, and makes them available via a single interface. Every page footer lists the original docs page, the license, and the copyright holders. For example the footer of the “10 minutes to pandas” page is:
It seems to me that the 3rd clause of the BSD 3-Clause License, would require Pallets to provide explicit written consent for this integration to be possible. The clause is as follows:
So before I start working on a PR to devdocs, would it make sense for whoever can take this kind of decision here (maybe @davidism ?) to reply including the click docs there is OK? Or am I overthinking this? For what it’s worth, devdocs is free to use, ad-free, and hosted by a donor-supporter nonprofit, freeCodeCamp (of which I am not part, I just use devdocs and occasionally contribute to it.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
As a Click user, why would choose 3rd party service that is less responsive, potentially outdated and less adjusted for Click compared to the original website? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In the end I’ve included it with a specific mention that there is no endorsement, so we should be in the clear:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
In the end I’ve included it with a specific mention that there is no endorsement, so we should be in the clear: