-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unify Optimism naming #12192
Labels
C-enhancement
New feature or request
D-good-first-issue
Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
Comments
mattsse
added
C-enhancement
New feature or request
S-needs-triage
This issue needs to be labelled
labels
Oct 30, 2024
mattsse
added
D-good-first-issue
Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
and removed
S-needs-triage
This issue needs to be labelled
labels
Oct 30, 2024
🙋🏽♂️ |
cool, let's wait until this pr is merged: |
@stevencartavia if you want, you can also look into alloy-rs/op-alloy#204 |
sure! :) |
This was referenced Oct 30, 2024
Closed
This was referenced Nov 6, 2024
This was referenced Nov 7, 2024
marking this as completed thansk @stevencartavia |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C-enhancement
New feature or request
D-good-first-issue
Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
Describe the feature
op-alloy settled on
Op
prefix, our crates still useOptimism
we should rename our types here to
Op
as well.this should happen type by type, e.g:
OptimismPayloadBuilderAttributes
->OpPayloadBuilderAttributes
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: