New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug - Documentation doesn't reflect pf-v5-pficon usage #3823

Closed

mayusoma-redhat opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 2 comments

Milestone

Prioritized backlog

mayusoma-redhat commented Nov 24, 2023

Describe the problem
The documentation for v5 still uses the old pficon-xxx format

Expected behavior
The documentation should reflect the correct usage for v5 as pf-v5-pficon-xxx

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

mayusoma-redhat added the bug label

patternfly-build added this to PatternFly Issues

github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs triage in PatternFly Issues

wise-king-sullyman moved this from Needs triage to Backlog in PatternFly Issues

wise-king-sullyman added this to the Prioritized backlog milestone

Collaborator

wise-king-sullyman commented Nov 28, 2023

Thanks for reporting this issue! The team will address when able.

edonehoo added the Groom label

kmcfaul removed the bug label

edonehoo removed the Groom label

Collaborator

edonehoo commented Nov 1, 2024

Closing: looks like this was addressed at some point , plus the v6 site also have up-to-date info now

edonehoo closed this as completed

github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in PatternFly Issues

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment