You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure what situations this is going to be well estimated. I had done some initial tests with examples like this data rich situation where it can recover the log_ratio_mix parameter -- but haven't explored less data / larger ranges of the mixture parameter / fraction of zeros / etc
set.seed(123)
range <- 1
x <- stats::runif(5000, -1, 1)
y <- stats::runif(5000, -1, 1)
loc <- data.frame(x = x, y = y)
spde <- make_mesh(loc, c("x", "y"), n_knots = 70, type = "kmeans")
sigma_O <- 0.3
sigma_E <- 0
phi <- 0.2
s <- sdmTMB_simulate(~ 1, loc, mesh = spde, family = lognormal(),
B = 1,
phi = phi, range = range, sigma_O = sigma_O, seed = 1
)
zeros <- sample(1:nrow(s), size=2000, replace=F)
second_mix <- sample(1:nrow(s),size=500, replace=F)
s$observed[second_mix] <- exp(log(s$observed[second_mix]) + 2)
s$observed[zeros] <- 0
mlog <- sdmTMB(data = s, formula = observed ~ 1, mesh = spde,
family = delta_lognormal_mix())
expect_equal(log(exp(mlog$sd_report$par.fixed[["log_ratio_mix"]])+1), 2.0, tolerance = 0.01)
We should do some testing but I'm not sure you can actually estimate the proportion very often. The Laplace approximation may not work well here.
It can currently be fixed by doing something like this
but that's pretty clunky if you almost always need to do it.
We may want to disable estimation of this proportion entirely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: