Density - Publish 1.1 with PhET-iO Upgrades

[markgammon]

As part of the "batch release" milestone https://github.com/orgs/phetsims/projects/44, publish Density, for brands=phet,phet-io.

[arouinfar]

As of 4/3/23, these appear to be the only outstanding issues before moving Density into QA:

• Mystery Screen: Random block set has inappropriate volume range #154
• CT Designed API changes detected, please roll them back or revise the reference API: #133
• Zoom feature does not work for 3D portion of the sim #50
• Dynamically constructed enumerations wind up with the same structure, confusing PhET-iO density-buoyancy-common#76
• Add density to perennial/data/phet-io-api-stable #160

[arouinfar]

Density 1.0 is currently listed in the PhET-iO Simulations spreadsheet as "PhET-iO Studio with future migration support". However, the link to the simulation was never published, and only one partner currently has access to it. According to @kathy-phet we do not need to support migration to the 1.1 version, so no migration rules are necessary.

Here's the relevant discussion in the phet-io Slack channel (from ~2 months ago), with the partner name redacted:

Sam Reid
Greetings! We noticed that density is listed as “PhET-iO Studio with future migration support” but it also does not have a URL issue listed. So we wanted to check on that. Is it missing the URL?

Amy Rouinfar
No, the lack of a URL was intentional at the time, but is worth reconsidering. Density was published right as we started a lot of the Studio improvements, and we delayed publishing the URL thinking the batch release would kick off “any day now”. The latest version of Density might support some of the more modern Studio features, but not all.

Amy Rouinfar
Also, I’m not sure if QA fully tested PhET-iO or not.

Sam Reid
I feel the question about whether we need to support migration is: “do we have a client that is using the old version that we want to support migrating to a newer version?”

Amy Rouinfar
I am pretty sure that {{partner name}} has access to it currently (not because we gave it to them, but because they saw it in the spreadsheet and followed the standard URL pattern to get to it). I don’t think we are supporting migration, but Kathy should confirm.

Kathy Perkins
We published it, but I didn't put the URL because we decided we needed to add the improvements around customization. {{parner name}} asked for the URL, so I gave it to them but with the caveate that we needed to republish it. We aren't supporting migration.

Kathy Perkins
QA did fully test PhET-iO of Density at the time - but lots of changes since.

[arouinfar]

4/19/23 dev test created

• Dev Test: Density 1.1.0-dev.3 qa#930

4/26/23 dev testing completed

[arouinfar]

5/11/23 rc.1 created

• RC Test: Density 1.1.0-rc.1 qa#942

5/22/23 testing completed

[arouinfar]

6/4/23 rc.2 (spot check) created

• RC Spot-Check Test: Density 1.1.0-rc.2 qa#953

6/5/23 testing completed

[arouinfar]

6/6/23 Density 1.1 was published.