-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
2-Poder360Fixer.Rmd
251 lines (218 loc) · 8.47 KB
/
2-Poder360Fixer.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
---
title: "Poder360 Polls Fixer"
author: "Daniel T. Ferreira"
output: html_document
---
<!--
This file is (c) 2020 CincoNoveSeis Jornalismo Ltda.
It is licensed under the GNU General Public License, version 3.
-->
Let's fix Poder360 polls! First, let's import some useful libraries.
```{r}
library(purrr)
library(tidyr)
library(dplyr)
library(readr)
library(stringi)
library(stringr)
library(lubridate)
library(mgsub)
library(sqldf)
source('polling_utils.R')
source('polls_registry.R')
```
And define an useful function:
```{r}
concatenate_id = function(x, y) {
paste0(ifelse(x == 'TSE', 'BR', ifelse(
nchar(x) == 6, substring(x, first=5, last=6), NA
)), y)
}
```
Then, we import the TSE Registry data:
```{r}
estatisticos_ids = read_csv('data/manual-data/estatisticos_ids.csv')
df = load_poll_registry_data('./data/tse', estatisticos_ids)
df_for_merge = get_poll_registry_for_merge(df)
```
We start by importing the dataset, removing unwanted polls (e.g. second round
simulations before the first round of the election takes place), and performing
basic normalizations.
```{r}
all_p3 = read_delim('data/poder360/all.csv', ';', escape_double = F, trim_ws = T)
p360_empresa_correspondence <- read_csv("data/manual-data/p360_empresa_correspondence.csv")
dfp3 = all_p3 %>%
filter(year(data_pesquisa) == ano) %>%
mutate(num_registro = normalize_simple(num_registro)) %>%
mutate(raw_nr = str_replace_all(num_registro, '[\\s\\-\\/]', '')) %>%
mutate(raw_nr = recode(raw_nr,
`RN00032014` = 'RN000032014',
`PI00782014` = 'PI000782014',
`PI00852014` = 'PI000852014',
`PI00932014` = 'PI000932014',
`DF00043214` = 'DF000432014',
`BR10372014` = 'BR010372014',
`GO14952016` = 'GO014952016',
`C055462018` = 'AC055462018',
`0001362012` = 'MG001362012'
)) %>%
mutate(raw_nr = ifelse(nchar(raw_nr) == 9, concatenate_id(orgao_registro, raw_nr), raw_nr)) %>%
mutate(cmp_ue = normalize_simple(ifelse(!is.na(cidade), cidade, unidade_federativa_nome))) %>%
mutate(has_problematic_id = is.na(raw_nr) | (ambito != 'BR' & ambito != 'RE' & ambito != str_sub(raw_nr, end = 2))) %>%
left_join(election_dates, by = c('ano' = 'year')) %>%
mutate(turno_realizacao = ifelse(data_pesquisa <= first_round_date, 1, 2)) %>%
mutate(position = recode(cargos_id,
`2` = 'p',
`1` = 'g',
`4` = 's',
`3` = 'pr'
)) %>%
mutate(CD_CARGO = recode(position,
`p` = 11,
`pr` = 1,
`g` = 3,
`s` = 5
)) %>%
mutate(estimulada = tipo_id == 2) %>%
mutate(raw_cand = normalize_cand(candidato)) %>%
mutate(candidate_without_title = normalize_cand_rm_titles(raw_cand)) %>%
filter(turno_realizacao == turno) %>%
mutate(norm_cenario_desc = normalize_simple(cenario_descricao)) %>%
filter(tipo_id != 3 & !grepl('REJEICAO', norm_cenario_desc)) %>%
filter(ambito != 'RE') %>%
filter(percentual != 0) %>%
filter(condicao == 0 & !grepl('EM BRANCO|NULO|NENHUM|BASE|TOTAL|OUTROS|OUTRAS|NAO SABE|NAO RESPOND|RECUSA|NS\\/NR|CITOU OUTRO', raw_cand))
```
The Poder360 database comes with a number of ID-less polls, or polls with
invalid IDs. To address this, we try matching these polls with the TSE poll
database by pollster and date.
Note that there is some room for improvement here! There are some companies
that should be easy enough to match if we put in more effort.
```{r}
without_id = dfp3 %>%
filter(has_problematic_id) %>%
select(pesquisa_id, data_pesquisa, instituto, unidade_federativa_nome, cidade, cmp_ue) %>%
distinct(data_pesquisa, instituto, unidade_federativa_nome, cidade, .keep_all = T) %>%
inner_join(p360_empresa_correspondence, by = c('instituto' = 'instituto')) %>%
mutate(joinid = row_number())
matches = sqldf('
SELECT * FROM without_id INNER JOIN df_for_merge ON
without_id.cmp_ue = df_for_merge.cmp_ue AND
without_id.cnpj = df_for_merge.NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA AND
ABS(julianday(without_id.data_pesquisa) - julianday(df_for_merge.DT_FIM_PESQUISA)) < 5') %>%
subset(select = -c(cmp_ue)) %>%
group_by(joinid) %>%
filter(n() == 1) %>%
ungroup()
dfp3_2 = dfp3 %>%
left_join(matches %>% select(pesquisa_id, NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA),
by = c('pesquisa_id' = 'pesquisa_id')) %>%
mutate(raw_nr = ifelse(has_problematic_id, NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA, raw_nr)) %>%
filter(!is.na(raw_nr) & nchar(raw_nr) == 11) %>%
select(-NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA)
```
Now, we basically repeat the algorithm we applied to our manual polls to solve
the "BR problem". Fortunately, the post-filtered Poder360 database doesn't
have presidential polls outside BR polls; all we have to deal with are non-BR
presidential polls:
```{r}
br_polls = df_for_merge %>%
filter(startsWith(NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA, 'BR')) %>%
select(DT_INICIO_PESQUISA, DT_FIM_PESQUISA, NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA, QT_ENTREVISTADOS, f_id, NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA, DS_DADO_MUNICIPIO) %>%
rename(br_poll_id = f_id) %>%
rename(br_poll_id_raw = NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA)
state_polls = df_for_merge %>%
filter(!startsWith(NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA, 'BR')) %>%
select(DT_INICIO_PESQUISA, DT_FIM_PESQUISA, NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA, QT_ENTREVISTADOS, f_id) %>%
rename(state_poll_id = f_id)
p3merged = dfp3_2 %>%
filter(position == 'pr' & !startsWith(raw_nr, 'BR')) %>%
distinct(raw_nr, cmp_ue, instituto, position) %>%
mutate(joinid = row_number()) %>%
inner_join(df_for_merge, by = c('raw_nr' = 'NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA')) %>%
group_by(joinid) %>%
filter(n() == 1) %>%
ungroup() %>%
mutate(joinid = row_number())
p3j1 = p3merged %>%
inner_join(br_polls %>% select(-DS_DADO_MUNICIPIO), by = c(
'DT_INICIO_PESQUISA' = 'DT_INICIO_PESQUISA',
'DT_FIM_PESQUISA' = 'DT_FIM_PESQUISA',
'QT_ENTREVISTADOS' = 'QT_ENTREVISTADOS',
'NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA' = 'NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA'
)) %>%
group_by(joinid) %>%
filter(n() == 1) %>%
ungroup()
p3j2 = p3merged %>%
filter(!(joinid %in% p3j1$joinid)) %>%
inner_join(br_polls, by = c(
'DT_INICIO_PESQUISA' = 'DT_INICIO_PESQUISA',
'DT_FIM_PESQUISA' = 'DT_FIM_PESQUISA',
'QT_ENTREVISTADOS' = 'QT_ENTREVISTADOS',
'NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA' = 'NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA',
'DS_DADO_MUNICIPIO' = 'DS_DADO_MUNICIPIO'
)) %>%
group_by(joinid) %>%
filter(n() == 1) %>%
ungroup()
p3j = bind_rows(p3j1, p3j2) %>%
select(raw_nr, position, br_poll_id_raw)
dfp3_3 = left_join(dfp3_2, p3j, by = c('raw_nr' = 'raw_nr', 'position' = 'position')) %>%
mutate(raw_nr = ifelse(!is.na(br_poll_id_raw), br_poll_id_raw, raw_nr)) %>%
filter(!(position == 'pr' & !startsWith(raw_nr, 'BR'))) %>%
mutate(cmp_ue = ifelse(position == 'pr', 'BRASIL', cmp_ue))
```
Let's remove excessive scenarios:
```{r}
dfp3_4 = dfp3_3 %>%
group_by(raw_nr, estimulada, position, voto_tipo, instituto, cmp_ue, cenario_id) %>%
mutate(scenario_count = n()) %>%
mutate(scenario_id = cur_group_id()) %>%
ungroup() %>%
distinct(scenario_id, raw_cand, percentual, .keep_all = T) %>%
group_by(scenario_id) %>%
filter(n_distinct(raw_cand) == n()) %>%
ungroup() %>%
group_by(raw_nr, estimulada, position, voto_tipo, instituto, cmp_ue) %>%
mutate(multiple_scenarios = n_distinct(scenario_id) > 1) %>%
filter(scenario_count == max(scenario_count)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
select(-scenario_count)
```
Finally, we merge the Poder360 database with the TSE polls database, and
subsequently match the candidates:
```{r}
p360_joined = dfp3_4 %>%
mutate(joinid = row_number()) %>%
inner_join(df_for_merge, by = c(
'raw_nr' = 'NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA',
'cmp_ue' = 'cmp_ue'
)) %>%
group_by(joinid) %>%
filter(n() == 1) %>%
ungroup() %>%
mutate(norm_voto_tipo = normalize_simple(voto_tipo)) %>%
mutate(vv = norm_voto_tipo == 'VOTOS VALIDOS' | grepl('VALIDOS', norm_cenario_desc)) %>%
group_by(raw_nr, SG_UE, NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA) %>%
filter(n_distinct(ambito) == 1) %>%
ungroup()
```
And let's save the result:
```{r}
p360_joined %>%
mutate(main_source = 'Poder360', source = NA) %>%
rename(NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA = raw_nr, year = ano, candidate = raw_cand, result = percentual) %>%
select(year, NR_IDENTIFICACAO_PESQUISA, SG_UE, NM_UE, CD_CARGO, estimulada, scenario_id, vv,
candidate, result, DT_INICIO_PESQUISA, DT_FIM_PESQUISA, DT_REGISTRO,
NR_CNPJ_EMPRESA, QT_ENTREVISTADOS, cmp_ue, norm_est, est_id, is_fluxo, is_phone, self_hired, partisan,
first_round_date, second_round_date, turno, main_source, source, candidate_without_title,
multiple_scenarios) %>%
write.csv('output/pindograma_poder360_polls.csv', row.names = F)
```
<!--
# TODO:
# Resolver n_distinct(ambito) > 1 dentro da mesma pesquisa
# Tentar reduzir as without_id.
# use party to cross cands and p360 as a backup!
-->