Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] [Minor] Include TST Folder tab URL schema in the Documentation #3409

Closed
fabiorzfreitas opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@fabiorzfreitas
Copy link

fabiorzfreitas commented Nov 8, 2023

Abstract

This is a very minor suggestion, no more than just a small addiction to the docs for ext+treestyletab:group?title=<TITLE>, ext+treestyletab:group?title=<TITLE>&temporary=true and ext+treestyletab:group?title=<TITLE>&temporaryAggressive=true.

Steps to see the situation

On my Bookmarks bar, I have a fix link to ext+treestyletab:group?title=<TITLE>. I find it useful when I know I'm going to need some kind of a workspace for my next tabs.

Expected result

I found the 3 URL schemas (meaning what comes after ?) by clicking the buttons and checking the URL change, easy enough.

Actual (present) result

I didn't recall immediately that I could use this simple method, so I started by searching this repo (issues, wiki, code etc.). I think it would be nice to have those described somewhere.

Environment

  • Platform (OS): Windows 11
  • Version of Firefox: Firefox Developer 120.0b7 (64-bits)
  • Version (or revision) of Tree Style Tab: 3.9.7

Edit

PS: I don't know if there are any other "arguments" to be used like this, a useful one would be something like Expanded=true for other behaviors for a folder, it would be useful to know them!

@piroor
Copy link
Owner

piroor commented Nov 9, 2023

OK, I've added a FAQ topic for that: https://github.com/piroor/treestyletab/#user-content-feature-requests-how-to-open-new-group-folder-tab-intentionally

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants