Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

px-backup fails for non ssl backup #357

Open
whoatemyjam opened this issue May 21, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

px-backup fails for non ssl backup #357

whoatemyjam opened this issue May 21, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@whoatemyjam
Copy link

whoatemyjam commented May 21, 2022

Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?:
BUG REPORT
What happened:
Added s3 backup storage without ssl and by checking disable ssl button and it got validated but backups are failing.

" Error uploading resources: blob (key "backup/bkup-6-435607e/6ad9dfc6-88db-4a3f-bb23-72984c9737a7/namespaces.json") (code=Unknown): RequestError: send request failed caused by: Put "https://bastion.baremetal.xyz:8020/portworx/dbackup/bkup-6-435607e/6ad9dfc6-88db-4a3f-bb23-72984c9737a7/namespaces.json": http: server gave HTTP response to HTTPS client "
What you expected to happen:
with ssl disabled in backup location and validated , the backup must complete instead of trying to go via https and failing
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
create a s3 bucket , in our case scality cloudserver, go to add cluster in px-backup, add backup location and credentials in cloud setting and perform backup of any object
Anything else we need to know?:
is there a way to add self signed certs in px-backup config so backups can be performed using them
Environment:

  • Container Orchestrator and version: openshift 4.9
    oc version
    Client Version: 4.9.13
    Server Version: 4.9.13
    Kubernetes Version: v1.22.3+e790d7f

  • Cloud provider or hardware configuration: Azure

  • OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release): Coreos

  • Kernel (e.g. uname -a):

  • Install tools: helm

  • Others: px-backip app version 2.2.0, without portworx cluster

@diptiranjanpx
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, there has been a regression in 2.2.0 version which is going to be fixed as part of 2.2.1 release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants