Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Would you consider to support scribble? #2

Open
OlingCat opened this issue Jun 9, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Would you consider to support scribble? #2

OlingCat opened this issue Jun 9, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@OlingCat
Copy link

OlingCat commented Jun 9, 2018

Sometimes we need documenting our code with Scribble. Would you consider supporting that?

@OlingCat OlingCat changed the title Would you like to support scribble? Would you consider to support scribble? Jun 9, 2018
@pouyakary
Copy link
Owner

Hi Oling, Hope you're doing great!

To be honest I'm a little busy right now since I don't have the contributors I used have on my projects and therefore adding more features to support is now only an option for priority stuff. I would love to have the Scribble docs supported but I cannot promise any time. It may happen tomorrow or months from now.

However if you can contribute it to the package I would be more than happy to have your PRs merged.

Hoping for you to have such a nice time.
Pouya.

@OlingCat
Copy link
Author

OlingCat commented Jun 9, 2018

OK, I'll try to add this feature. It seems not very difficult to me ;-)

@pouyakary
Copy link
Owner

Awesome. I guess only syntax highlighting would be required (or maybe I have no idea) but if it's only syntax highlighting, I suggest you check out the original tmLanguage guide and build the syntax.

Also it would be awesome to have as much as token names as possible. If you do so, I can promise to have all the tokens colorized in the best way that I can in the ProColors theme.

Thanks a lot for your interest and so I will assign you instead of me.

@pouyakary pouyakary assigned OlingCat and unassigned pouyakary Jun 9, 2018
@OlingCat
Copy link
Author

Recently I made a syntax highlighting for personal use which may be a little buggy (mainly for block comment). But later I found two Racket LSP implementations from here, so we may rewrite this extension with TypeScript 2.0 and choose an LSP as backend.

Well... it's pretty hard for me, I need time to learn TypeScript, LSP and how to develop a VSCode extension. Do we need some help form others?

cc: @dram

@pouyakary
Copy link
Owner

It’s awesome that LSP packages exist for racket. I like to implement them, as I said it’s not a priority so it’ll take sometime till I find free time but I will implement it.

Till then TypeScript is just JavaScript not much more so don’t feel afraid of it and also you don’t need it, you can just use plain js.

I will implement it someday but if you can do it faster then it’ll be much more awesome

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants