-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing worker integration #26
Comments
We should probably discuss Storage Access and workers again, including this question. @annevk do you have time for the next PCG call in 2 weeks? |
I'm out the week of February 3, if that's the week you mean. |
Ah, that's good to know, thanks. Maybe we should skip this discussion to the call after next, then? cc @privacycg/chairs |
Thanks Anne, would love some help on workers. I kept the SAH spec in terms of |
SAH specifically integrates with "navigate", but nothing is done for worker environment creation. Normally we'd try to treat the main worker resources in much the same way we treat documents. |
Aha, the integration with "navigate" is specifically for the |
I realize that Storage Access itself isn't properly sorted out around workers though we do have a plan of sorts, if I remember correctly. However, it seems that this specification doesn't address them at all. Just like documents have subresources, workers do too. I could see not handling style sheets as having subresources, but since workers create their own environments I think they probably need to be handled in some fashion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: