Input handling for network templates #3902
Labels
Status: Completed
Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed.
Type: Bug
Inconsistencies or issues which will cause an issue or problem for users or implementors.
Type: Maintenance
Updating phrasing or wording to make things clearer or removing ambiguity.
Milestone
Please describe your feature request:
Current Template:
Expected Template:
Current format:
{{Host}}
and{{Hostname}}
is specified to support both pre-defined port + as other port with user input.After update:
Describe the use case of this feature:
host
with port andhostname
to ensure hardcoded port and user-defined input is getting respected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: