You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! I’m wondering how to evaluate the results for each forest region individually. Currently, evaluation_stats_FOR.py only returns a single set of evaluation metrics for all the forest plots. Is it possible to use this script to calculate metrics for all the plots within each forest region, as displayed in Table 10 of the paper, or has it been implemented somewhere? Thank you for your help!
Another related question: It seems the returned metrics are primarily oAcc, mAcc, IoU, and mIoU. How can I obtain additional metrics such as F-score, Cov, and the number of detected trees for each forest plot, as shown in Table 6?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello! I’m wondering how to evaluate the results for each forest region individually. Currently, evaluation_stats_FOR.py only returns a single set of evaluation metrics for all the forest plots. Is it possible to use this script to calculate metrics for all the plots within each forest region, as displayed in Table 10 of the paper, or has it been implemented somewhere? Thank you for your help!
Another related question: It seems the returned metrics are primarily oAcc, mAcc, IoU, and mIoU. How can I obtain additional metrics such as F-score, Cov, and the number of detected trees for each forest plot, as shown in Table 6?
Hi, thank you for your interest! Since I’ve changed my workplace and worked on other projects in between, I’ll need some time to locate the previous code... However, the issues you mentioned are relatively straightforward to address:
Evaluating metrics for each forest region: For the first question, you can put the output files from the same forest into a single folder and then use the existing evaluation script to calculate metrics for each forest region individually.
Additional evaluation metrics: Regarding F-score and Cov, these are actually included in the final evaluation file, but sorry the naming might have caused some confusion. The "Instance Segmentation MUCov" corresponds to Cov, and the "Instance Segmentation F1 score" corresponds to the F-score. As for the number of detected trees, you could try to print the true_positive value to get that value.
Hello! I’m wondering how to evaluate the results for each forest region individually. Currently,
evaluation_stats_FOR.py
only returns a single set of evaluation metrics for all the forest plots. Is it possible to use this script to calculate metrics for all the plots within each forest region, as displayed in Table 10 of the paper, or has it been implemented somewhere? Thank you for your help!Another related question: It seems the returned metrics are primarily
oAcc
,mAcc
,IoU
, andmIoU
. How can I obtain additional metrics such asF-score
,Cov
, and thenumber of detected trees
for each forest plot, as shown in Table 6?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: