You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at a small subset of collected data I noticed that we have two date formats (e.g. for date-of-test), yyyy-mm-dd and dd.mm.yyyy. These seem to correlate with entry IP address. Although the mixed-format dates are still resolvable, this introduces unnecessary ambiguity into the raw data.
Looking at the code, this is probably because we use <input type="date"> and then getStringContent from that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking at a small subset of collected data I noticed that we have two date formats (e.g. for date-of-test),
yyyy-mm-dd
anddd.mm.yyyy
. These seem to correlate with entry IP address. Although the mixed-format dates are still resolvable, this introduces unnecessary ambiguity into the raw data.Looking at the code, this is probably because we use
<input type="date">
and thengetStringContent
from that.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: