-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat: hot tags filters #199
Comments
For global hot tags, I've come up with multiple solutions so I thought maybe we can talk about which one to pick here. Initially, I wanted to "using multiple sorted sets as different buckets and keep rolling them up into the previous buckets as we move forward", but I've come to realize we have better ways to do it:
Which one do you think we should go with? @SHAcollision @tipogi |
I will go with 3rd option. Setting up different timeframes to execute the query against database and after store the result. I will not over-complicate for that feature. When it would be expensive the query database, we could go maybe with the first option or other implementation? The problem that I see here is when we add filters to that time window as |
For example, in the hot tags module of the app, there is also an option to filter by |
Somewhat similar to #89
I believe @amirRamirfatahi was working on this one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: