Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Be aware of DBOUND #1690

Open
dnsguru opened this issue Jan 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Be aware of DBOUND #1690

dnsguru opened this issue Jan 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
❔❔ question Open question, please look / answer / respond 🚩🚩🚩Want Browser Feedback 🚩🚩🚩 Topics that would benefit from input of Browser dev

Comments

@dnsguru
Copy link
Member

dnsguru commented Jan 23, 2023

There is a proposal to begin evolving DBOUND within the IETF - something that performs some (not all) overlapping functionality with the PSL.

IETF often brings forth proposals that solve specifc and narrow purposes, and in this proposal it would be helpful if devlopers using the PSL could review the DBOUND and participate in that group discussion.

Participation will help to ensure as minimum an adverse situatuon results should DBOUND change the status quo use of PSL that are baked in.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-pearce-domain-boundaries-dbound/
@dnsguru dnsguru added the ❔❔ question Open question, please look / answer / respond label Feb 27, 2023
@dnsguru dnsguru added the 🚩🚩🚩Want Browser Feedback 🚩🚩🚩 Topics that would benefit from input of Browser dev label Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
❔❔ question Open question, please look / answer / respond 🚩🚩🚩Want Browser Feedback 🚩🚩🚩 Topics that would benefit from input of Browser dev
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dnsguru