Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix and simplify 'make prebuild' to fix master workflow #3097

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

thomas11
Copy link
Contributor

@thomas11 thomas11 commented Feb 21, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (407899e) 60.96% compared to head (67b7469) 60.90%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3097      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.96%   60.90%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines       11274    11274              
==========================================
- Hits         6873     6866       -7     
- Misses       3840     3847       +7     
  Partials      561      561              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@thomas11 thomas11 requested a review from a team February 21, 2024 09:41
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

@thomas11 thomas11 merged commit 6ec28dc into master Feb 21, 2024
33 checks passed
@thomas11 thomas11 deleted the tkappler/fix-make-dist branch February 21, 2024 10:13
thomas11 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
This is a regression that I introduced in #3097. This PR reworks the
`prebuild` target to work the same way other targets like
`provider_prebuild` work, using a local marker file to track state.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Workflow failure: master
2 participants