You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If possible, it would be great if you could add a column that shows at what efficiency after stacking penalties a module is running on, and perhaps what modules affect each other to this end.
As an example, this would make it a lot easier to see how I would compose my fit between tracking computers and tracking enhancers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be a good feature, however instead of an additional column, perhaps have it as the tooltip when hovering over the current misc column. However, this might be a more complicated change due to the way calculations take place in pyfa - the effective modification is applied, but not stored anywhere AFAIK. I can take a look into this as time permits, but can't promise it. =)
It might be difficult to give a single number for the stacking penalty, since each effect stacks separately. Modules like Adaptive hardeners may have different stacking penalties for each of the different resistances they provide (due to extra modules being used to plug the biggest resist holes).
Even with the specific example of Tracking Computers, you might have issues if some computers are scripted and others are not (the unscripted ones will have different stacking penalties for their range and tracking bonuses due to the scripted ones only providing a single bonus).
This is already somewhat shown in the Affected By tab. Stats that are stacking penalized show a (penalized) next to them, it just doesn't show how much and what the penalty is. It'd be fairly trivial to take that info as an end users and figure out the stacking penalties yourself.
If possible, it would be great if you could add a column that shows at what efficiency after stacking penalties a module is running on, and perhaps what modules affect each other to this end.
As an example, this would make it a lot easier to see how I would compose my fit between tracking computers and tracking enhancers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: