Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please update CLAST. #2425

Open
marcoxa opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 13 comments
Open

Please update CLAST. #2425

marcoxa opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 13 comments

Comments

@marcoxa
Copy link

marcoxa commented Jun 25, 2024

Hi

CLAST, a full blown AST library for CL (avec "environments") has been updated for LW, SBCL and Allegro.

Please update it in Quicklisp.

Thank you

Marco

@Hexstream
Copy link
Contributor

According to Quicklisp's configuration for this project, this should happen automatically whenever the next Quicklisp dist gets released, unfortunately subject to ongoing delays.

@marcoxa
Copy link
Author

marcoxa commented Jun 28, 2024

Well. Zach deserves his time away doing fun things.

Any ways to get a more "community supported" effort with Zach as "Lord Vetinari" of Quicklisp?

@Hexstream
Copy link
Contributor

See #2386.

There is also Ultralisp.

@marcoxa
Copy link
Author

marcoxa commented Jun 28, 2024

Sorry. That is not an answer. Especially since Ultralisp does not seem to support Gitlab (at least as stated on the front page).

TRT would be to pick up Zach's work.

Or to come up with a properly federated package management system like Julia's.

@digikar99
Copy link

digikar99 commented Jun 28, 2024

Is ocicl an option? I have seen one of my gitlab packages (the only one) being available on ocicl. (Request additions here.)

I have a wish list for a conda-lisp channel dedicated to lisp. That'd also allow distributing lisp implementations and also make it easier to depend on non-lisp dependencies.

@Hexstream
Copy link
Contributor

@marcoxa

That is not an answer.

It is an answer, and there are others, but yes, there is plenty of opportunity for further innovation in library distribution mechanisms and other critical pieces of infrastructure in the Common Lisp community.

@marcoxa
Copy link
Author

marcoxa commented Jun 28, 2024

@marcoxa

That is not an answer.

It is an answer, and there are others, but yes, there is plenty of opportunity for further innovation in library distribution mechanisms and other critical pieces of infrastructure in the Common Lisp community.

Ok. It is an answer. Just not a good enough one for me.

@marcoxa
Copy link
Author

marcoxa commented Jun 28, 2024

Is ocicl an option? I have seen one of my gitlab packages (the only one) being available on ocicl. (Request additions here.)

I have a wish list for a conda-lisp channel dedicated to lisp. That'd also allow distributing lisp implementations and also make it easier to depend on non-lisp dependencies.

Hi.

I looked ad it and it has at least two severe shortcomings. (1) it is too much Linux/Unix-based. (2) it does not try to take into account LW and ACL. (3) golang? Seriously? (4) conda must die.

Ok. I should not be so moderate :)

Having said that, "OCI"s seem interesting.

@kilianmh
Copy link

Especially since Ultralisp does not seem to support Gitlab (at least as stated on the front page).

Ultralisp does support Git repositories from any source (e.g. Gitlab, Codeberg etc.).

@digikar99
Copy link

digikar99 commented Jun 28, 2024

Ultralisp does not seem to support Gitlab (at least as stated on the front page).

I just recalled I had added gitlab packages to ultralisp too. The note on the front page might be a bit misleading. Non-github support might be a bit fragile, but it is there. As long as you have a project URL (perhaps a VCS or git-based), you can add it to ultralisp.

@digikar99
Copy link

conda must die

Oh, I can't live without micromamba (and hopefully, rattler-build someday) :D. Anaconda and miniconda are ridiculously slow. But micromamba has been just awesome!

@marcoxa
Copy link
Author

marcoxa commented Jun 28, 2024

conda must die

Oh, I can't live without micromamba (and hopefully, rattler-build someday) :D. Anaconda and miniconda are ridiculously slow. But micromamba has been just awesome!

I can. I do Julia these days in my day job :)

@digikar99
Copy link

conda must die

Oh, I can't live without micromamba (and hopefully, rattler-build someday) :D. Anaconda and miniconda are ridiculously slow. But micromamba has been just awesome!

I can. I do Julia these days in my day job :)

Thanks for the recommendation! I'm gonna take a look, although I'm looking for something language (and OS) agnostic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants