Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
This manual section explains how to attach a SPICE opamp model to Qucs-S https://qucs-s-help.readthedocs.io/en/latest/SubLib.html#using-manufacturers-component-data-libraries There exists two devices that may be used for this purpose:
It's need to kep in mind that SPICE models don't have an unified syntax. And for example LTSpice models may contain some unique syntax constructions that need to be rewritten to use this model with Ngspice. This task cannot be performed automatically. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm still learning where best place to post some so small observations, and if convenient, pls move this from this thread. In the above indicated link, in third paragraph of Libraries Blacklisting the directive in the star phrase has been written as ```*.balcklist````, whereas I assume the correct would have been blacklist. HTH |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Qucs-S supports |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I tried to find about this in the present documentation, and except due a terminology mishap of mine, I did not find anything.
Since the qucs-s approach to employ engines which in their guts use Spice as a lingua franca for circuit simulation, I wonder how easy would it be to implemente and/or document the use of spice models of different manufacturers.
Even some more prosaic models could be useful as the ones exported by Coil 32 , for example, in the evaluation of circuits where the anoying imperfections of the coils make some responses lacking, etc.
Perhaps, due the use of more than a single engine (namely NG Spice, Xyce, and SpiceOpus) the instructions may need to be deferred to the specific engine?
However, I think having qucs-s as an unifying plattform for these chores would be a plus for this project!
--
Cesar Rabak
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions