You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you.
I see, so this is why every iteration in training, nnff is also called before nnbp to update nn.a.
With Bishop notation in his book, nn.a is rewritten to ---> z = sigmoid( nn.a )
I have a question in nnbp.m.
case 'sigm'
d{n} = - nn.e .* (nn.a{n} .* (1 - nn.a{n}));
and
case 'sigm'
d_act = nn.a{i} .* (1 - nn.a{i});
derivative of sigmoid is
sigmoid(x)/dx = sigmoid(x)*(1-sigmoid(x))
so.. shouldn'T it be like below?
case 'sigm'
d_act =sigm( nn.a{i}) .* (1 - sigm(nn.a{i}));
thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: