You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current Cohttp implementation, we have sexp derivers for all the underlying http types via Cohttp. As part of #94 we tried to build and run using httpaf-lwt-unix. The sexp ppx was turned off for now as Httpaf doesn't define sexp derivers. It might be tedious but we should explore just defining our own derivers without using the ppx. One added benefit could be it'd make it easier to use the dune future_syntax shim so we can write the bind/map in direct style.
We should be able to depend on just sexplib0 for the sexp related things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the current Cohttp implementation, we have sexp derivers for all the underlying http types via Cohttp. As part of #94 we tried to build and run using httpaf-lwt-unix. The sexp ppx was turned off for now as Httpaf doesn't define sexp derivers. It might be tedious but we should explore just defining our own derivers without using the ppx. One added benefit could be it'd make it easier to use the dune future_syntax shim so we can write the bind/map in direct style.
We should be able to depend on just
sexplib0
for the sexp related things.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: