You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a general request but what I specifically mean is that if e.g. you do:
DataFrame(rand(100, 100), :auto) |> pager
that it would be possible that recipe would be registered by DataFrames.jl that would by default freeze the "Row" columns and header appropriately. The key thing here is that this recipe would need to be able to properly calculate the number of rows/columns to freeze (currently you have manually count e.g. the width of "Row" column to properly freeze it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ah - maybe we can just have a custom pager method in DataFrames.jl once TerminalPager.jl becomes part of PrettyTables.jl and is imported by DataFrames.jl.
Good point. Currently, we can specify the initial freeze using keywords of pager functions. We can also remove the feature that allows the user to change it dynamically. Thus we can compute the size necessary inside DataFrame and call pager with the right numbers. Seems good?
P.S.: By the way, thank you for your contributions here, you always have good comments :)
This is a general request but what I specifically mean is that if e.g. you do:
that it would be possible that recipe would be registered by DataFrames.jl that would by default freeze the "Row" columns and header appropriately. The key thing here is that this recipe would need to be able to properly calculate the number of rows/columns to freeze (currently you have manually count e.g. the width of "Row" column to properly freeze it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: