Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is SX126X really supported? #1

Open
adminy opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Is SX126X really supported? #1

adminy opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@adminy
Copy link

adminy commented Apr 26, 2024

Looking at:

https://github.com/chandrawi/LoRaRF-Python/blob/67cb5c96fd4bb95db57e176590ced4b78b3f1192/LoRaRF/SX126x.py#L103-L105

and then comparing that to:

https://github.com/chandrawi/LoRaRF-Python/blob/67cb5c96fd4bb95db57e176590ced4b78b3f1192/LoRaRF/SX127x.py#L70-L73

Its like they choose not to include ook in there for the modem type.

And you say that SX126x will work ?!

I have the usb dongle, just wondering if its possible to do that from linux rather than an arduino / microcontroller env.

@ropg
Copy link
Owner

ropg commented Apr 26, 2024

Not sure about 126X specifically, but the OOK modem types are often only usable if you know the exact bitrate and want it to filter transitions that do not match that bitrate. If you want to have a more generic receiver, it's often better to put chips in a "direct mode". Often that needs an IO line that is generally not the interrupt line, which is, depending on the hardware, sometimes not connected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants