From 79fc92143fac99da4269df44e4b067e16ef3eac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Luke W. Johnston" Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:31:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] chore: :bento: add feedback data from intro course 2025 --- data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-overall.csv | 18 ++ data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-precourse.csv | 132 +++++++++ .../2025-01-14/feedback-quantitative.csv | 20 ++ .../feedback-sessions/2025-01-14.csv | 166 +++++++++++ .../feedback-sessions/2025-01-15.csv | 162 +++++++++++ .../feedback-sessions/2025-01-16.csv | 271 ++++++++++++++++++ data/intro/2025-01-14/overview.csv | 42 +++ 7 files changed, 811 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-overall.csv create mode 100644 data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-precourse.csv create mode 100644 data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-quantitative.csv create mode 100644 data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-14.csv create mode 100644 data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-15.csv create mode 100644 data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-16.csv create mode 100644 data/intro/2025-01-14/overview.csv diff --git a/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-overall.csv b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-overall.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9c97584 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-overall.csv @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +date,response +2025-01-16,"The quality of instructors varied, and my evaluation of them as a whole reflects that. Luke and Anders worked very well." +2025-01-16,Greatly structured course! All the best! +2025-01-16,It was a really nice course :) +2025-01-16,Very nice learning environment and great pacing. I also really liked the coding sessions. Maybe do a more in-depth recap after every session and emphasize the main take-aways more. +2025-01-16,"I think the teachers were VERY good and the webside was just working so well, easy to follow!" +2025-01-16,I wish I could have download the documents other than only online +2025-01-16,Great with enthutiastic and patient instructors +2025-01-16,"Hmm its tough, but maybe do a intro course on R with less focus on Git and then with more coding from the intermediate course to get people started. Then perhaps have a reproducibility course as a prerequisit for being allowed to take the advanced course. Or have some more R coding excersices before the course to understand the basic language concepts a little more before hand." +2025-01-16,tells us to print cheat sheeps ahead of time so we can mark in the cheat sheet what we've tried and which chapter on the webside we can go to for help? +2025-01-16,I would really much like some real examples. Eg. nice scripts from real project -different types. So that you would be able to se how it is done from the beginning to the end. +2025-01-16,Maybe reduce reading tasks and try to have simply group work exercises in between the session without templates to get our minds to think more by it self +2025-01-16,"I think the overall structure of the course worked really well, meaning the rotation between 'reading' sessions, 'coding' session, 'instructor-explaining-stuff-sessions' etc. That helped to keep me motivatet. Greatest draw-back I would say was the physical room, we were in. A window or two would have been nice, but of course I don't know if you have any control over that at all. Thanks." +2025-01-16,Great course in general!! +2025-01-16,"It was really nice but you should include ""Bonus"" info for people a bit ahead of schedule so we can take the chance to try more things if we have the time :) Things you will not cover but are available if we want them. Like little R treats along the way :)" +2025-01-16,"I will definitely use operators more in my coding to manipulate data and ensure clean and readable code. However, a few tasks during course was poorly written and caused confusion in several people. The task to work with "".."" or ""..."" was written a bit too confusing. But otherwise the inclusion of templates, solutions and the general written text was good and easy to follow." +2025-01-16,"As we are typing in and do not always look up, it is important that all the steps are spoken out loud. The r-cube website was good, as was the layout" +2025-01-16,I think there are many surveys forms and it is great but you are required to answer everything. Sometimes I felt like I wrote nonsens when I didn't have anything to report in both points just because it was required of me before being able to submit diff --git a/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-precourse.csv b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-precourse.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..80edec3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-precourse.csv @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +questions,responses +Why do you want to attend this course?,"As a powerful open-source tool for data analysis and visualization, R has become an indispensable asset for researchers. I began learning R a year ago but still feel that I have yet to grasp its essence, which is why I am eager to undertake systematic learning. This is particularly important for my research, which involves spatial metabolomics and big data analysis, areas where R is undoubtedly an essential tool." +Why do you want to attend this course?,"Because I am doing pharmacoepidemiological research, and will (as soon as data is available) be involved in data analyses using R. Since I am a total beginner, I would like to get kickstarted with this introduction course." +Why do you want to attend this course?,Because I work in public health and epidemiology and they all use R and r-studio (or stata) and I am used to using python. Collaborations and helping at courses doing TA work and understanding the scripts my supervisor sends me would be a lot easier if I had the basics for r down +Why do you want to attend this course?,Diving into omics data analysis +Why do you want to attend this course?,Fill the gaps in foundational R/git knowledge and learn how to build pipelines +Why do you want to attend this course?,"For my postdoc project, I will start working with sequencing data. Most analysis pipelines in my institute are implemented with R." +Why do you want to attend this course?,Get familiar with R +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I am about to start data analysis for my PhD project which requires using a coding-based statistical program. R is more commonly used among my colleagues, making it a practical choice for me to learn." +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I am currently doinga PhD in a Proteomics Lab, where my research involves working with large and complex datasets. While Excel has been helpful for basic data analysis and managing day-to-day experiments, the complexity of proteomics data exceeds its capabilities. To analyze these datasets effectively I need to develop my skills in R and data analysis in general." +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I am going to use R for the data analysis of my PhD-project, and I want to learn how to use R in a reproducible way" +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I want to be comfortable in using R because I want to use it for further data analysis for which I will need to take more advanced courses. Also I can see that is a very useful tool for data sorting and cleaning, more flexible than excel, with a lot of possibilities that I want to learn and use on daily basis." +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I want to improve my R skills, as this is a tool I will be usin a lot in my work." +Why do you want to attend this course?,I want to improve my reproducibility and open scientific data for further analysis +Why do you want to attend this course?,I want to learn how to use R to analyse data and to use R get an overview of data. +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I want to start learning R, especially producing reproducible research and get to know the use of Git." +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I wish to attend this course to get experienced in R, since my R knowledge only surrounds about statistical analysis and not data analysis." +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I wish to have a better understanding of data analysis, structure and coding. My project will in the future heavily rely in my ability to do advanced data analysis in Rstudio. I will therefore also apply to the future courses." +Why do you want to attend this course?,"I would like to attend this course because I need to use R for data analysis in my PhD project. As I am new to R, I have been recommended this course as a good starting point to develop the necessary skills for working with my data." +Why do you want to attend this course?,I would like to learn how to work with R and use it for statistical analysis for my research project. +Why do you want to attend this course?,I would like to start learning programming +Why do you want to attend this course?,"My primary goal is to become more familiar with R, because I see it used increasingly. I was also intrigued by the open science approach, which is different from other R courses I have seen offered at the universities" +Why do you want to attend this course?,To be able to use R as a tool to make data analysis. +Why do you want to attend this course?,"To fascilitate transfer of analysis process from mainly Stata to mainly R in particular due to the more flexible graphing in R, but also to utilize analytic tools that are not availble in Stata or hard to access (generalized pairwise comparisons, target trial emulation etc.)" +Why do you want to attend this course?,"To get a good start in learning how to code. I am planning two studies in my phd where coding will come in handy, and I am sure it will be very useful in my future research career as well." +Why do you want to attend this course?,To get to know the program R and improve my ability to use it for my work in my PhD. +Why do you want to attend this course?,To learn how to use R for my data analysis and management +Why do you want to attend this course?,To learn more about R and open science +Why do you want to attend this course?,"To learn more about R, not only what I can find with chatGPT" +Why do you want to attend this course?,To learn to work in R because I will need it for data analysis during my PhD work +Why do you want to attend this course?,to get familiar with an reproducible data analysis tool and be more consistent and transparent with my data management +"In your opinion, what worked well?",Clear instructions on how to prepare for the course :) +"In your opinion, what worked well?",Everything is detailed and user friendly so I found the whole thing really helpful and great +"In your opinion, what worked well?",Everything is very well explained and detailed! It was very easy to navigate through the different tasks. +"In your opinion, what worked well?","Gives a nice overview. Easy to excecute. Nice with videos for those not that familiar with R studio, but also just the option of entering the code if you are a little bit familiar with it. The instructions are easy to follow." +"In your opinion, what worked well?","Great to set up everything before starting, so we don't waste time in the course." +"In your opinion, what worked well?","Having pre-course material works well, as a ""forventningsafstemning"" - expectations-setting" +"In your opinion, what worked well?",How explicitly everything was explained. Nice that you could copy the code directly into rstudio +"In your opinion, what worked well?",I felt taken by the hand and the steps were easy to follow. It worked well that you explained things so detailed and it was good advice to start preparing in good time. +"In your opinion, what worked well?",I found it really informative. Good job. +"In your opinion, what worked well?",I had some troubles getting the code to work on my work laptop due to company restrictions. I am going to use my private computer now (it's much faster anyways). +"In your opinion, what worked well?","I liked the tone of the material, very pedagogical and I feel very guided and like someone is walking me through" +"In your opinion, what worked well?","I think it worked well, I was a bit confused regarding GIT and Homebrew, but I asked a fellow peer who helped me" +"In your opinion, what worked well?",I think the guide is the best guide I have seen in a very long time. Very thorough and easy to understand +"In your opinion, what worked well?","In my opinion, the pre-course provided a solid foundation of background knowledge" +"In your opinion, what worked well?","It is nice to have this pre-course introduction which makes it easier to understand the syllabus, but the Github section is still a hard to understand as a beginner." +"In your opinion, what worked well?",It is very nice that so much of the installing packages can be done by copy-pasting text +"In your opinion, what worked well?",It was very easily understandable and I liked the videos +"In your opinion, what worked well?","It worked well to install R and read about some of the features. I read it a couple of times, since it took a while before my computer could install the programs (since it's under some restrictions from the Region Midt)." +"In your opinion, what worked well?","Nice workfrow, easy to understand" +"In your opinion, what worked well?","Screenshot of R studio, and the copy-button next to the mentioned command" +"In your opinion, what worked well?",The 3.1. with an overview of the tasks that needed to be completed. For most of the subjects there was a great guidance and videos to support it. +"In your opinion, what worked well?",The detailed info on pre-course page is great! +"In your opinion, what worked well?",The guide works really well and the more detailed description of how R reads function like pak::pkg_install is great. +"In your opinion, what worked well?","The preliminary introduction and explanation of Git are more important to me, and the detailed introduction to R and RStudio is also very helpful. I am grateful to DDEA and all the instructors for their efforts in this course, as it is extremely valuable for those who are new to R." +"In your opinion, what worked well?","The setup, with the different topics. It was easy to navigate. It was also easy to understand what I was expected to do, and that it was clearly written ""read this now"", ""do this now""." +"In your opinion, what worked well?","The short, numbered sections made it very easy to approach, and easy to leave and come back to without wasting too much time" +"In your opinion, what worked well?",The small videos from R. +"In your opinion, what worked well?",The steps are very clear and great tutorial. +"In your opinion, what worked well?",Yes +"In your opinion, what worked well?",the precourse material was a good introduction to the course. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","A very simple GitHub repository to try out, just to see how it looks like. Perhaps it was strategically left out" +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","As a participant with no prior experience with ""homebrew"" or using the ""terminal"" on mac, I found it quit challenging and a bit time-consuming to figure out how to install the git software. Maybe a short guidance on what homebrew is and can do and/or guidance on how the ""terminal"" works would be beneficial for beginners as me." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Everything has been great so far! I don’t have any suggestions for improvement at the moment. Happy to share feedback if anything comes to mind during the course. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","Honestly can't think of anything. It was relatively short, relevant and relatable" +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",I believe the pre-course preparation materials are very detailed. My suggestion is to provide corresponding tasks to help with understanding and memory. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",I could have used even more examples of using R codes before the course. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","I encountered some trouble configuring Git. The function returned: I orig[nm] <- git_cfg_get(nm, ""global"") %||% list(NULL) : number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length. With a little help from ChatGPT, I tried to manually configure in Terminal which I think worked out..?Future material could try to amend this and also let the student know, that they might have to work outside a work-VPN. My workplace's VPN seemed to have a firewall that made RStudio unable to find the CRAN-repository. As soon as I got on my private wifi, it worked fine." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","I find it very difficult to answer this question before taking the course, as I currently don’t know what else I might need to prepare for." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","I still really didn't understand what I did when installing packages in Rstudio, and it didn't always look as it did in the videos, so for me as a beginner, I could have used even more explanation. I would have benefitted from being told that if I have an university-computer, I might not need to download the programs as you suggested, but just install them through my software center. I find the code of conduct a bit aggressive (or very American). I don't know if there have been experiences at the course that makes this necessary, but to me it was a bit much, especially when some things were repeated. Maybe because I see the ""expected behaviour"" as normal appropriate behavior :)" +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","I was a bit confused about the terminal vs console in the guide explanation under ""3.4 Installing the latest programs"" when r, r-studio and git has to be installed. Also because you have two terminals.(I work on mac) but you have a terminal on your pc and one in r-studio (Which is the same) but then there is also the console. I do not know if others are confused" +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",I would like to see estimated time to spend on precourse materials. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","It took some time for me to figure out how to install homebrew. Is was not aware it was on my computer terminal the code should be typed. I can se now you have stated this, so I dont now how you can improve this" +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","Maybe a bit more information regarding the homebrew and git? I was confused, I found the Git in the terminal of the mac with help from a peer. :-D" +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Maybe a separate document/page for the pre-course work. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","Maybe mention that the red colour is nothing to worry about not only in the Q and A section but also in the pre-course material, as I was a bit worried during the install that something had gone wrong." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","Move the notes in section 3.4 to right after the introduction. Section 3.7: give the option of watching the video or cope/paste the code right after each other, to let the reader know that there is two options. Most will probably see the video and thereafter register that there was a second option. For someone with a little bit of R experience, the video feels a bit redundant. Also move the warning field up, so the reader is made aware of this before entering the code." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",N/A +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Not much. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Not sure - it is nicely done already ! +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Nothing +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Nothing +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Nothing +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Nothing +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",Please provide a guide on how to update R and R-studio. (or a link to a guide) +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","Put warnings ahead of the task, got to warnings after I'd had the issue." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",The introduction is really helpful and gives a nice picture of what to expect from the course. +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","The layout. When you open the link from the mail, you start on section 3. Would be nice to just start from section 1." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","This is probably an individual issue. Some work computers need administrative access to install R3. So you have to run Rstudio as administrator, however newer versions of Rstudio might not open when run as administrator. I found a workaround by creating a shortcut to the .exe file and then adding ""--no-sandbox"" in the properties section. This allows Rstudio to open and run as administrator and subsequently install R3." +"In your opinion, what could be improved?","maybe a FAQ... ""These common mistakes can be solved if you try this and that""" +"In your opinion, what could be improved?",nothing +Please describe the problems you've had.,"3.7 Installing R packages. Even after restarting R, I kept encounting errors when running the code: r3::setup_git_config()I got the message ""der er ingen pakke med navnet 'r3'." +Please describe the problems you've had.,Company policy restrictions +Please describe the problems you've had.,Error in loadNamespace(x) : there is no package called ‘r3’ +Please describe the problems you've had.,"Getting the correct version of the programmes, needed help from a colleage to solve it" +Please describe the problems you've had.,"I couldn't install the program, but that was because I wasn't allowed. The problem was easily solved with IT-support from SDU, since the programs were available in the software-center. There was also an error in the process of installing GIT, that I never really got solved, and suddenly I could move on." +Please describe the problems you've had.,It was checking whether Git was installed or not +Please describe the problems you've had.,Problems with installing the programs because of restrictions on my computer (administered by Region Midt). +Please describe the problems you've had.,See previous answer (the one about what could be improved) +Please describe the problems you've had.,"This command did not work for me: pak::pkg_install(""rostools/r3"", upgrade = TRUE)The first time I ran it, it downloaded a lot and then stopped at igraph. This meant that I could not download the: r3::install_packages_introduction() because r3 was not installed.SolutionI tried: install.packages(""igraph"", type = ""binary""), which worked, but this did not:
install.packages(""igraph"", type = ""source"")I got a warning saying: Warning in install.packages : package ‘r3’ is not available for this version of RI updated the R version to: R version 4.4.1 (2024-06-14)Next time i wrote: pak::pkg_install(""rostools/r3"", upgrade = TRUE)I noticed that in the output the igraph was just a version update and that was stopping the r3 packages from being downloaded.I just changed ""upgrade = TRUE"" to ""upgrade = FALSE"" and proceeded.Output can be seen below✔ Loading metadata database ... done → Will install 2 packages.→ Will update 1 package.→ Will download 2 packages with unknown size.+ igraph 2.1.2 → 2.1.3 👷🏻🔧+ r3 0.3.0 👷🏽‍♀️🔧 ⬇ (GitHub: c554431)+ r3admin 0.0.1 👷🏿‍♂️🔧 ⬇ (GitHub: 545c112)? Do you want to continue (Y/n) n" +Please describe the problems you've had.,"This is probably an individual issue. Some work computers need administrative access to install R3. So you have to run Rstudio as administrator, however newer versions of Rstudio might not open when run as administrator. I found a workaround by creating a shortcut to the .exe file and then adding ""--no-sandbox"" in the properties section. This allows Rstudio to open and run as administrator and subsequently install R3." +Please describe the problems you've had.,error: cannot run gpg: No such file or directoryerror: gpg failed to sign the datafatal: failed to write commit objectFixed by configuring Git to use the correct GPG program +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"Basic understanding of R language, data management and workflow, versioning" +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,Git/Github and reproducible code. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I aspire to gain a deeper understanding of the powerful capabilities of R and the fundamental principles of coding, aiming to apply them flexibly in future omics data processing tasks to support my research endeavors effectively." +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I expect that the course will provide me with proper guidance and instruction on using R. I would like to learn how to report reproducible research and effectively visualize data. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I expect to become more familiar with R studio, Git and tidyverse to improve my future data analysis, which hopefully helps me become more confident with analysing data" +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I expect to get an introduction to R and reproducibility in my work. I'll use it in my PhD. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I expect to get more familiar with R than I am now. I would like to be able to collaborate with a data manager, and understand the work he/she is doing to an extent that I can have an impact on the analyses of my data. At some point, I would like to learn to do analyses myself, but I do not know if I can expect to learn that in these three days." +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I expect to know how to get started with new data sets in R and which packages might be useful for data organization. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I expect to learn how to get started with R and to become familiar with the program itself. I understand that this course does not focus on statistics, but I aim to gain knowledge about how to use R as a tool for data analysis, which I can apply in my PhD project." +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I expect to learn the basics of R, and hopefully get able to extend my knowlegde afterwards. I want to be able to perform analyses, especially at the server at statistics denmark." +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I expect to learn the basics of R, making it easier for me to develop my skills on my own afterwards, so that I will be able to use R for my upcoming data analysis. I also expect to become more familiar with github, learn more about how and when to use it, so that I will be more comfortable using it in the future. Figure 6.2 hit me hard..." +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I expect to learn the basics of how to use R for statistical data analysis. I hope that I will be able to perform some basic statistical data analysis after the course. Furthermore I hope the course will enable me to know how and where I can find further guidance on how to perform more advanced data analysis in R. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I expect to learn the basics, the terminology, achieve the fundamental understanding of coding and using R in research. I hope this will enable me to develop my skills further after the course. My two studies are not very complicated statistically, so I hope I will be able to code the data myself, although I have access to help from colleagues and supervisors." +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I hope I will get a better structure for my scripts in Python so that I can make my research more reproducible. I have never had formal training in that and they are always a mess. Furthermore, I would like to be able to better/faster understand/read other peoples r-scripts and TA at public health" +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I hope to get the basics of R analysis thus learn a new concept of data analysis +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,"I hope to learn different ways of visualizing and extracting data. To answer the biological question that I have. In the future I hope to be able to implement existing packages for advanced data analysis, create code independently and become proficient in troubleshooting." +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I hope to learn how to use R in a constrictive and meaningful way. Also to adhere to the principles about open and fair science. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I want to learn all the basics and be able to use simple features of R but in a fast way after this course (now I need to think a lot before coding) +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I wish to learn about Github and how to take advantage of the tools which are avaibalew in Github. The major reason why I attend this course it to get introduced to data analysis and data management. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I would like to enter the area of programming and analysis my own data by time +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I would like to learn the basic language of R and use this course as a stepping stone to get familiar with the platform to use it for my data analysis +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,I’m hoping to build a solid foundation in R that I can start using right away in my research. I’d like to learn the basics—how it works and how to get started—since my current knowledge is almost zero. My main goal is to feel confident enough to start using R for analyzing the proteomics data I work with. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,Problem solving with less need for chatGPT assistance +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,See aboce. I would like to use R to help me understand output from a clinical database. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,The above. Do analysis on my PhD project in R +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,To analyise proteomic data and to statistics test on that data. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,To learn how to open datasets in R. To learn the interface and options. To learn about websides for packages and help from th ecommunity. Data visualisation. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,To manage and analyse data in a reproducible way and to present same data meaningfully. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,Working systematically in R to make cooperation easier and secure reproducitbility. Proper version control. +What do you expect to learn and what would you like to be able to do with what you've learned?,learn fundamental tools and skills for conducting a reproducible and modern analysis for a research project. I would like to get a great start when I begin my data analysis in the spring. diff --git a/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-quantitative.csv b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-quantitative.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..65f76ed --- /dev/null +++ b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-quantitative.csv @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +statement,response,n +I think I learned a lot from this course,Agree,9 +I think I learned a lot from this course,Neutral,1 +I think I learned a lot from this course,Strongly agree,18 +I think the content on the website clearly communicated the concepts,Agree,4 +I think the content on the website clearly communicated the concepts,Disagree,1 +I think the content on the website clearly communicated the concepts,Neutral,1 +I think the content on the website clearly communicated the concepts,Strongly agree,22 +I think the instructors clearly communicated the concepts,Agree,11 +I think the instructors clearly communicated the concepts,Neutral,2 +I think the instructors clearly communicated the concepts,Strongly agree,15 +I think there was a good mix of learning activities that encouraged my active participation,Agree,8 +I think there was a good mix of learning activities that encouraged my active participation,Strongly agree,20 +I think there was good alignment between the learning activities,Agree,6 +I think there was good alignment between the learning activities,Strongly agree,22 +"I think this course has given me enough of a solid, basic grasp of the concepts that I feel confident about continuing using and learning them in my work",Agree,9 +"I think this course has given me enough of a solid, basic grasp of the concepts that I feel confident about continuing using and learning them in my work",Neutral,4 +"I think this course has given me enough of a solid, basic grasp of the concepts that I feel confident about continuing using and learning them in my work",Strongly agree,15 +"In general, I think this is a good course",Agree,4 +"In general, I think this is a good course",Strongly agree,24 diff --git a/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-14.csv b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-14.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2de5e05 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-14.csv @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +session_name,question,response +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Clearer instructions at the webpage. In general for the whole course: consider how much of the stuff we just read that needs to be said directly after. The start of the break was not honored. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"I do not like that I have to press that many buttons to add and commit stuff to history, but for most participants at this course, I definitely think this is the right way to teach it. I can see that I can also just use the terminal but again, I think the way you are teaching it makes the most sense." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"I do not understand what is going on with git yet, I'm getting more and more confused" +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,I would like more examples on how i can use git. I am not sure whether i should use it for anything other than my data-analysis. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,I would rather more visualising at reading section +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,It was difficult to understand the Git session. There was a need for more instruction before the practice. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,It's a little hard for me to understand the Git and how to process with it. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Maybe a concrete example of when you use git? for exampel is it good when you want to do several analysis on one dataset? +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Maybe highlight a bit more when adressing the pros/cons of git what sort of work can/cannot be managed with git. GDPR considerations etc. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"More a general comment about teh entire day. I get why you wwant to setup the Git environment, Quarto etc, but maybe it would also be a nice solution to actually start by learning som R code to make things more relateble to what most people know already and then implmenet Git steadily. Also. considering the emphasis on the code of conduct actuelly during the day I got a little annoyed by the swearing (F-word)." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,More examples and try to keep up the pace with previous section +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,More explanation of how /if this software is relevant for our daily work. More details about working with this version control when you work with personal data +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"Still a little bit hard to grasp what git is, and what actually happens when we commit something. And also, do we need to commit everything in our project - what happens if we don't? Perhaps it will become clearer later on in the course, but right now it's still a little bit confusing. So perhaps, try to make that a litlte clearer (or repeat it several times... I might just have missed it)." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Still unsure if I will really use this tool +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"There is a lot of reading, but I guess that is the only option to understand how it works fully." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,To much reading for this section when you repeat everything anyway. Maybe try code along for this section +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,To much reading with a explanation of what we just read +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Try to give more concrete examples. Something that ties it even more to our work. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"Would have been nice to know how to setup Git in an unrelated project folder where it isn't automatic. I know you guys said that there are a multitude of ways, but maybe some are easier or harder to do, but an example would be nice." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,a bit hard to follow +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,all good +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,could use a more thorough introduction - how to view the history when there are lots of commits to different files (filter by file?) +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"it would be easier just to stage and commit the same file more than once, instead of changing multiple files and setting tool which we want use." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,more streamlined explanation +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"session 7 is just difficult to understand, but it makes more sense in the end" +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,so far so good +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,to slow +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Again nice slow tempo :) easy to get help +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,"Again, applying what we have learned by doing the excercises." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Committing files on our own +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Fun +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,"Git was nicely explained but the pace was a bit slower then in previous sections, maybe some more interaction" +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Good arguments for using Git. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Good introduction to complex concepts +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Great introduction to version control and the purpose of Git +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,"Help from instructors, very quick and nice." +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,I could commit to git with help. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,I have understand the mindset of git +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,I liked the exercise were we did somthing a little more on our own. It is nice to have both code-along and something were we need to think a little more. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,I think everything +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,I think the Git procedure is really useful. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,It was ok +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,"Reading tasks, showing how to do things on screen" +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Slow pace was necesarry +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,The hands on with possibility to ask questions and get help. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Very well explained and nice to try how it works +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,all good +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,good clarification from instructions on what we are doing +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,good script +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,good to separate git and github - never understood the difference before +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,nice pace. +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,practical excersise +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,the outline +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,the possibility to ask if any doubts +"Day 1, afternoon part 1",worked well for,the tasks where we have to code +"Day 1, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"I just had some issues with Git installation/connexion to RStudio so maybe a ""just in case you don't see the Git logo in your RStudio"" section for the pre-course could be usefull ?" +"Day 1, afternoon part 2",worked well for,all good +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,A little confused about the OneDrive comment which may or may not be a problem? +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,I am a bit curious about r3. Is that a package created of you for this course? +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,I could have used the break earlier :) +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,"I do not have any constructive comments, because I liked the speed everything was unfolding." +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,I think it was great +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,I think it was really nice overall. +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,I think it's much better if we can type more. +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,"I would have liked a short presentation round of everyone, or some kind of short exercise to let us know each other. I know lunch etc. will be for networkning, but I think an ""icebreaker"" would be good." +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,It worked well +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,"It's always frustrating when someone has not done the pre course tasks because it slows down others, but this was not a major problem at all!" +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,Maybe a 5 min break in the midle of the session. +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,Not much. +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,"Not much. Might be usefull with a note in the start on that we are not really starting with R yet during this session - but really not very important. AND - it was not clear from start that I should introduce my self to my table-friends. I could be visualized with a ""welcome-slide"" with three bullets at the screen. Then I would also had known about the table animals." +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing comes to mind +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing so far +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing. +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,"Technicality, the projector is terrible. The enlarged UI the presenter has works fine, but the projector itself has low resolution and contrast, possible also low lumen." +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,"The stand-up session was ""waste of time""" +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,Too slow +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,good +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,i don't have suggestions for the sessions. But I'm stressing over having enough mental capacity to interact with strangers during lunch while also learning a lot of new stuff today. I think I need a break. +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,nothing +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,"so far so good, looking forward to the rest od the course" +"Day 1, morning part 1",could be improved for,survey about prior skills could be done as standing up or sitting down instead of being too crowded at the front +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Easy to follow +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Everything +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Everything was really nice. Slow and with a lot of humor. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Everything. Nice introduction +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"EverythingMuch help, good tempo, and very pedagocical set-up" +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Good mix of interactive activities and teaching. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Good pace and nice overview +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Good presentation of the course and slow (good!) start of introduction to reproducibility and R +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"Good speed, good mix of reading and presentation" +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,I think everything worked well +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,I think the interaction is the best part. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,It was easy to follow the instructions. Reading sessions. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,It was light and easily understandable. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,It was perfectly slow - easy to follow. Very good teaching with different tasks. Nice to read. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,It was really nice to know getting some schedule what will happen in advance. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"Nice and smooth introduction into R, which I really enjoyed." +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"Nice introduction and setting up the workspace, made me less scared about attending." +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"Nice mix of group, lecture, standing up etc." +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,Nice to stand up with the little exercise + the hats +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"Really good introduction, and clear instructions" +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"Starting off slow, covering the basics." +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,The hats. What a great ideaIt is also nice with the online guide where you can follow along.Reading material is nice and the atmosphere is nice +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,The introductory part was very good to set the scene and point out why the course is relevant. Nice with the reading task in between and the showing how to click things in Rstudio. Great teacher +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,The live coding session speed and the discussion with the neighbor is great. I also enjoy the more than necessary allocated time for reading. Provides great space for people that are a bit more slow at reading. +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,The switch between reading tasks and presentation from Luke +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"Very low level and low speed, which worked well for me" +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,hats and good time for sessions +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,introduction to Rstudio and projects was very useful. The hat thing i good +"Day 1, morning part 1",worked well for,"screensharing, reading sessions" +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,All good +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,"I didnt understand why we did the tidyverse thing - it seemed out fo context. I went to the webpage and read, and got a bit more enlightend. Im starting to get confused weather we will look an analyzes at all, but maybe we are not and that was stated in the pre course :D" +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,"I think the netoworking activity is a bit redundant as we just had lunch and networked there. I think it would be better to place it in between lectures, so they could work as a break." +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,I would like to know how to generate the PDF :) +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,It is hard to see the code from the back row +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,It was good +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,It was perfect +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,Jeg var lidt forvirret i forhold til hvad der skulle skrives hvorhenne i forbindelse med koden. Blev en smule i tvivl på grund af layout på hjemmesiden. +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,Maybe a bit less reading? +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,Maybe add more practice work +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing for me +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing particular +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing to comment on +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,"The spaces still create confusion. Like header it is # header and not #header. I also think, not related to this block that there is a confusion between the languages and the program.r and rstudioMarkdown and Quarto" +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,all god for now +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,"could have played around with it a bit more, and explore other functions" +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,don't know +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,dont know +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,"hmmm.... maybe more tasks or longer tasks, for those who finish the exercises early? not really necessary though..." +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,"i don't comprehend what I read. Afterwards things are mostly explained, but for instance 6.6 was weird to read" +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,maybe more practice sessions where we actually write the code from the theory - but I think this might come later on :) +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,nothing +"Day 1, morning part 2",could be improved for,"perhaps a list of word and their meaning. e.g. what is github, function, package etc." +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"A bit more hands on. When I read the text I don't understand it, 'cause I don't know what to use it for yet. But then, when there is an exercise, it makes more sense." +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"Again nice tempo, working good to read parts before." +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,Easy step-by-step walk throug the code +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,Everything +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"Everything, it is really well worked course" +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,For the typing by myself +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"Good time for assistance, easily understandable and well explained concepts." +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"Great pace in the code along part, easy to understand explanations" +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,It is really nice with the code alongs! +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,It was nice to practise hands on and see that I am able to do so +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,Most +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"Nice speed, everything was clear" +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,Nicer to go trough the exercise alone/groups +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,Pacing var meget fint. +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,Self programming task was fun +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"Starting the session with talking to the table mates was nice, being a little bit tired after lunch. Quick session with a short topic - works well." +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"The code and follow, and reading." +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,The exercise! +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,"The guiding on the main screen, where we can do it outself on our own screen. The practices." +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,The practical excersize was good +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,Typing the codes yourself +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,code along and the social activity with fresh air +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,everything +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,good tempo +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,instructions were clear +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,nicely paced session +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,the code along +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,the follow-through with the instructor +"Day 1, morning part 2",worked well for,very easy and non-intimidating introduction to markdown diff --git a/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-15.csv b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-15.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c686b7c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-15.csv @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +session_name,question,response +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Difficult understanding the reading tasks and the disadvantages with GitHub +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Faster flow +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,I just personally struggled a bit more due to an unknown kind of error but otherwise all good +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,I think we should have gone through the part about connecting your git to the github together as with many of the other tasks. I had trouble and didn't really got sufficient help until the hole session was almost over. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,I'm not always sure if my screen looks like it should because we have been doing so much with different instructors so the instructors also have different outputs in RStudio. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,It was great - 10/10 :) +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"It would be more intuitive to have the Connecting to GitHub explanation within the same page as the rest of information, right before 10.5 Synchronizing with GitHub instead of jumping to another tab" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Maybe add the pre-course chap 9 directly to the course material? Maybe not practical? +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"My functions for setting up github worked, I would have liked to know how to do it manually as well. The PAt was new to me and I think I sould have liked to have that introduced orally as well" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Nice time schedule for this session. Shouldn't be much longer. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Nothing for me +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Nothing. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Perhaps installing a password manager during the pre course would be an advantage +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Reading about the personal access token and setting up github was not enough for me. I would have preferred the teacher to explain it beforehand and then maybe read and then the doing it. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Skipped over some discussion about GDPR and also for registry data based studies GitHUb is not a possibility. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,The setting up github took to long. There was a lot of waiting time for those who could do it right away. I suggest having some optional exercises that we could do individually in the waiting time +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"There were a lot of problems with making a token, so maybe spend more time on that" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,Too much time for the github section. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,don't know +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"more details on the workflow - how exactly is it ""powerful"" and better than eg. onedrive or tracked changes" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,not sure +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,"nothing, I really liked it!" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,overall really nice +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",could be improved for,too much Github. Would rather like more training in R - and not so much the collaboration part with Github etc +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Easy to follow again. Good session. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Generally a good session. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Good amount of time for the Git exercise which was quite hard +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,"Great instruction and explanations, very easy to follow" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,I liked the exercises +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,I think it's really helpful to know the Github and create it for myself +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Introduction of GitHub. It was very easy to setup GitHub with the clear instructions. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,It was easier to setup github than expected +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,It was nice with the code to easily setup github +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,It was perfect with much more practise +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Lots of time to work on the subject for easier understanding +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Most +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Setting up Git on our own +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,The written guides were great and explanatory for the individuals codes. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,To sit ourselves with Github +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Tydelige instruktioner. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Understood the GitHub and how to push-pull +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,Working more on your own with GitHub. Very nice. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,everything +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,"good individual help, thank you. good tempo" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,good that you have enough helpers so that no one falls behind +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,hands on experience with github concept +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,"more practical, less reading" +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,really nice pace. I think it's really nice we ourself have the opportunity to get familiar with GitHub and then you show us again. +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,the work with R +"Day 2, afternoon part 1",worked well for,timing is good +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,I found it a bit more difficult to follow. Maybe because of some accents.The part about boolean operators and the TRUE/FALSE part was confusing. I think if it is just explained with a clinical example then it is fine.Like:women & above 65 means ONLY woman above 65and:Woman | above 65 means ALL woman regardless of age and also people above age 65 regardless of sex +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,a bit overwhelming +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,Overall really nice +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,a lot of hands-on experience +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Brush up of how to open our project in r studio +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Clearness about open the project from yesterday in R before starting exercises. In general I needed to be held in hand more to follow the few exercises we were doing. +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,"Could probably spend a bit less time on this particular subject, to give more time for others" +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Emphasize on the different options to show or not messages and warnings. Get some examples on error messages and how to solve them +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,I think it would be better if we can talk more about the data managemant. +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,"I think the environment with the variables should be introduced when we have to go through the dataset. It might not be relevant for this exercise but I think it is the easiest way of getting a feel for a dataset, when I can scroll through columns and rows" +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,I would rather less summary after we read since we already read +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,I'm not done with the reading when we stop. +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,"It was evident that not all had openede the projects from yesterday or loaded the dataset. Also, I guess at least for me it would have been nice to be introduced to tools that could help fix the problems in the dataset otr at least to be told that these will be presented later. E.g. how to automaticalli switch between long and wide format, rename in bulk, ad value labels etc.." +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Maybe more about how to import different dataset (excell) and how that look in R. +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Maybe trying some different commands on our code to see what the effect is - such as echo +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,More example for tidy or messy data could be helpfull especially for long format table :) (more complex example would help) +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,More excercises +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing. +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,"Nothing. Really nice with an ""easy"" morning session. A little reading, a littele explanation, a little chat in groups. Nice!" +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing? +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,Starting from scratch: how to open the data correctly +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,cant think of anything +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,discussion part too long. +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,found it all very nice +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,maybe few examples on how to navigate through cheath sheets +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,"more sessions where we discuss with each other throughout the course! :) I am still lacking a good understanding of like the meta-stuff. What does the it mean to enter something in the different panes, what is saved, what is not, what is the ""working space"", what is the results..? I don't have the right names or questions for it yet, and reading or hearing about it is good, but when I am forced to articulate something (like when discussing with other student) it becomes clearer." +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,nothing I guess +"Day 2, morning part 1",could be improved for,sometimes you forgot to make us put on the green hat after doing something practical +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,"""what is wrong with the data"" discussion was great" +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,A run through of a data set and how to make it more tidy +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,All of it +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,As always nice to go over the most important points from the reading sessions in plenum. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Discussion with neighbours +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Good explanation of data tidyness +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,I got into more - I have faced with error and got help. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,I like the speed of things at it is so lovely that you go over the reading material to be sure everyone understood it correctly +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,I think the tidy data is relly useful for me to condudct something in the project. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,It was a really nice session. It was great looking at the dataset to see the problems in the structure. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Looking at the dataset and finding the messy things. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Nice level of the stuff we were learning for a morning session. In general Luke is a very nice teacher. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,"Nice to start of easy at the beginning of the day, also by doing some repetition from yesterday." +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Pace was perfect to follow and understand each step of importing data +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Reading sessions was good +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Slow tempo. You said several times yesterday that it is reading-heavy. I think it is a perfect amount of reading :) +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,Talking about tidy data with neighbors and in the big group to get a feeling for what it actually is/means. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,The assesment of data (tidy vs messy) +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,The flow of the presentation was good. And it was a good summary of what occurred the day before. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,The website and ready exercises +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,code along +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,good discussion session looking at a real dataset +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,"good exercise to think about the data- I'm new to R / tidy, so good to reflect" +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,good explanations +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,good rythm +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,really good recap of yesterdays work +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,the discussion part with each other. +"Day 2, morning part 1",worked well for,well paced +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"Before we begin the course, recommend people who are more analog to print a cheat sheet with relevant codes" +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,Even more tools and practice on how to make figures. +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,Having a split screen so that the output could be seen together with the code? maybe having the output in the viewer pane besides the source pane? +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,I would have liked more time to play around with the graphs +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"If instructor answers questions in plenum, try to keep the room quiet and not as noisy, or maybe repeat the question out loud" +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,It could have been slower +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,It seemed more unclear from the instructor what the goals were +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,Jumping between course material and Rstudio was a little too fast sometimes and confusing +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,Maybe a bit slow and at some points uncertain explainations. Be a bit more certain with what you are saying. +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,None +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing for me +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"Putting more effort into explaining the basic prinicples of the code ""terminology"" before explaining the code itself could save you the mountain of questions you got during the sesssion" +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"Remember to be consistent with naming. Also perhaps specify, that for a code string to run, you have to be sure that all variable names are identical to the variable name in the data frame. Especially, considering the data we are working with is a bit messy and has big letter at the beginning of a variable, which easily messis things up if one is not aware of it." +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"The start was a bit confusing, not understanding if an exercise was initiated or if we were just shown some stuff. It was a learning session for the teacher, so it is expected not to run as smooth as earlier, but it ended up being a bit confusing throughout the session and it didnt help my learning." +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"When a single student gets help at the same time as the teacher answers a question out loud, it is hard to hear :) maybe wait with questions in plenum to all student are ready?" +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"i think the concept of labeling to allow referencing in html is a little foreign for most, as this is not something you would use for a traditional word-file based manuscript. A little more xplaination of this would be nice. Also generally maybe it would be nice to sometimes present the result (the graph) and then talk about the steps needed to get there and not just say ""now we need to do a two cont graph"" and then start with the first line if the code. Just to prime people on the steps that follows to get from nothing to nice graph. As per this i believe some of this could have been on day 1 and some of the gut stuff could have come on later." +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"it was very, very slow. More time to just play around with it" +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"maybe one more short break, 5 min, in this session, as it is more code heavy, and I needed to focus more here during this session." +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,more info about syntax for also changing axis etc. +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,nothing +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,ok for now +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,overall fine +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,the instructor needs to tell all the steps which makes it more easier to follow +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,the rythm and the structure was a bit more chaotic but it is really no big deal - just because I have to say something that could potentially be improved :) +"Day 2, morning part 2",could be improved for,"went a bit fast at times. good thing to repeat instructions several times i.e. ""so insert new code chunk, *pause* insert new code chunk, everybody inserted a new chunk?""" +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,Easy to follow :) Tempo was good. +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,"For me,the part of ggplot is pretty important and intersting." +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,It is nice that it was so much hands-on coding +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,It was good to get to make a lot of different figures and realize it was not that hard. +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,It was great with less reading and more practising +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,It was great! +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,Nice to learn about ggplot +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,"Nice walk-throug. Nice pace. Very nice to be able to look up the code in the 'recipe' Luka had sent out, so we were able to code along at our own pace" +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,Nice with hands-on practice with the teacher as a guide. Great session! +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,Playing with different plot options (guided) +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,The actual mangling with data +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,The explainations of the code and how the individual ggplot functions and calls do was fine. +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,The hands on +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,"The mic, Ole speaks not that loud" +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,Thorough explanation of plots are incredibly useful +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,"Very good tempo, patience. I liked the examples, and how I could follow both the teacher and the material for auditory/visual learningI also like that the data-set is not ""perfect"" so we learn about real world data" +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,Very nice session +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,Very relevant +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,"You got an idea of how to change your plots, and thus use them for your own data" +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,"a lot of exercises , really good idea" +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,code along works great. nice to work with data +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,differentiate between the difference plots +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,impressive to see how quick and easy it is to make plots +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,nice built-up and good pace +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,showing step by step what to write in code for the exercises. +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,well paced. well introduced +"Day 2, morning part 2",worked well for,"works well by gradually adding functions to a graph, stepwise making it more complex." diff --git a/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-16.csv b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-16.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6e2bfd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/intro/2025-01-14/feedback-sessions/2025-01-16.csv @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ +session_name,question,response +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,A little slow +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,All good +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,I could have used some more options in the visualisation.Maybe having spend a bit more time on showing code for some figures with x and y labels and using different colours etc. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,I think the session worked well +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"In general, I would have appreciated more explanation before we did code-along, because it is hard to remember things when you do not know why you are doing stuff. Unfortunaly, pronounciation of language is a challenge with this teacher, since it is makes it hard to follow and some parts of the teaching. This is not helping my learning. On the first part of the session (Day 2), the talk about logical conditions was started without context and for someone who have not used R, this is quite confusing. It was also confusing that it was said both ""and"" and ""or"" about the ""|"", which is unfortunate when introducing a new thing. Further, the teaching sometimes continued even though not all green hats were up (=not everyone had finished). A suggestion for the exercises in this part, is to consider not to give away the template for the code (""___(___ >= ___ & ___ <= ___ & ___ == ___)"". It switches the focus from trying to remember how to do it and figure it out yourself, to focusing on to fill out blank spaces with the correct words. The template could be a hint." +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"It would have been nice with an introduction to how to figure out the arguments of a function. So if I was to use a function not teached in this course, how do I know the arguments it needs?" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"Maybe expand a bit on the true, false and condition logic in R, as I think this is an important thing to understand - in my opinion the explanation was a bit short." +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,More excercises +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,Nothing for me. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,Nothing. :) +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,Please take some time to listen a bit more to the questions the participants have. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"Text strings and variable names could be explained better. Like when to use ""..."" and when to not use ""..."". When is it considered a variable, like a column and when do we split the variable name. the ""PG""-part" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"The explanation of Logic was explained in a confusing way for those who haven't used R or coded before, This lead to long waits. in addition you have to make sure that you understand what people are asking for before answering them" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,The reading section should have been more elaborated +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,could be nice with exercises without templates too. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,it was ok - i guess i was wanting to now more in depth about how to manipulate date in some specific ways that is perhaps more for the intermediate +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,it workedd well +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,maybe an overview of the used functions? +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"more difficult tasks, maybe some without the ""fill in codes""" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,nothing it is good +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,the basics of logic was a bit long and I would expect unnecessary +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,use more time on answering questions +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",could be improved for,"was a bit fast. teacher should repeat instructions several times, so if you are struggling, you get another chance to hear the instruction." +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,Good examples using the data +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,Good tempo. Good with many repetitions. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,Great session. Nice and useful tools introduced. Good teacher! +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,"I like that there where more exercises, where we had to try out things own our own." +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,I like the tasks in this part +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,"I think the part of the function of the mutate,rename and filter is relly nice." +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,It was fast to do it and had a great flow +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,Many exercises on our own. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,Plenty of exercises are fun. Thank you +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,Relevant +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,The excersises. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,The exercises were really nice to practice and fully understand how these functions work +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,The flow again was fine and the live coding sessions is ok. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,The functions we are learning are important and I can see how they can be usefull for me. +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,"The instructor was great, and the time allocated was enough" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,The tasks +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,"Very useful concepts for piping and filtering, well explained and lots of time to test" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,a lot of hands on expeience with coding +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,all good +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,everything +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,"good exercises, good time" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,good pace and good exercises +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,good with practice yourself +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,"good with the helpers. explaining ""why"" as much as possible is good! gives me hooks and logic to remember things by." +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,it was a nice exercise +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,it was really good to code along the instructor! +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,nice pace +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,"very easy to understand the separation of functions related to ""rows"" and ""columns""" +"Day 2, afternoon part 2",worked well for,well done. Nice with the exercises! +"Day 3, afternoon",could be improved for,"I would have preferred a bit more guiding in the group project. Eg suggestions to which tables/figures we could make, so that focus would be more on how to use R and Git(Hub) in this setting, and not so much on interpreting a dataset/study I never heard about." +"Day 3, afternoon",could be improved for,"Simpler data to analyse would be nice, since it takes a lot of time to just understand the data itself before you can even start to analyse anything" +"Day 3, afternoon",could be improved for,We could have collaborated more on the project +"Day 3, afternoon",worked well for,Clear instructions for the project +"Day 3, afternoon",worked well for,Nice to use the tools we have learned in a meaningfull way +"Day 3, afternoon",worked well for,Nice to work together. Good we were only two. Gives each student more talking time and hands-on exercise time. +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,A bit slow +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,Again maybe if starting by presenting the end result it would lead to some better understaninding of the steps needed +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,"As the codes advance and become longer and more complex, it is really hard to keep up writing them as there are annoying yellow bars with info that cover what the teacher is writing. Tip: slow down, put in little breaks so that we (I) can keep up, don’t write and explain simultaneously, write first, then explain, write more, explain more, then run." +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,Could have used better explanations of the individuals functions and how they read the dataset such as facet_grid(). Also better critique of which plots to make and why. +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,Even more tools and exersices +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,"I suggest you be a little bit more clear what is is we aim to do/visualize before we start to create the code string (i.e., what kind of plot are we creating, and what do we want i to display). Also, when buidling the code, it would be nice if you would briefly repeat what each function is doing (kind of talking your way through the code as you type it, if it makes sense)" +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,"I think a little bit more ""lets try to remember how to code this plot"" would stress me to remember approach when I get home. For instance how we ggplot. Maybe just explain orally like:when we use ggplot we remember from yesterday that we then need to tell it which geom_ to use etc?Hard balance with enough stress to motivate memory but not too much stress to leave conform zone...." +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,"I would be nice if some of the exercises has more ""levels"". Like for instance: No/little template, full template (as now) and solution. I would like to be forced to think more" +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,It could have been slower +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,It was still a bit confusing and still some challenging regarding understanding what was said due to languagechallanges. +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,Maybe spend a little more time explaining the different functions what are their strengths and limitations. If there's enough time. Time spent solving exercises should be a priority. +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,Nothing on top of my head +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,"The colour palettes were very similar, so perhaps choose examples that are more different" +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,could be nice with simple cases e.g. for group work. without a template so we can think more about which code to use. if you have an similar example in plenum first you can find inspiration from that code +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,everything was good +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,none +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,nothing +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,overall nice +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,slightly slower going over the codes +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,"sometimes it would be nice to get some more knowledge on how and why the functions work as they do instead of ""just"" pressing enter and seeing something happening" +"Day 3, morning part 1",could be improved for,was great +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Becoming more familiar with the ggplot +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,"Coding together, and then doing excersises on our own." +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Doing the plots ourselves +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Easy to follow along. +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Easy to follow. Easy to get help. +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Everything +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Everything was well explained +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Fun and relevant +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Good code along - usefull learnings +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Good explanation +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,It was good to get to try the different functions of making the different plots and changing colours and stuff. +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,It's excellent to see the beautiful figures to show in the Rstudio. +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Lots of exercises +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Many exercises! +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Nice tools. Good teacher +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Nice with many exercises were we got to try stuff ourselves +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Plotting worked fine +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,Really got a sense of the strength of the pipe function in this session +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,all good +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,everything +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,"good exercises, very good tempo. I like how you consider that data should be usable to everyone." +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,nice coding exercises +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,nice pace. +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,nice to see different functions and actions presented +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,recap from yesterday s session +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,the practises were clear +"Day 3, morning part 1",worked well for,works well. +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,"Again, its fine to tell what you do at each step, but would be nice with more thorough explanations of why each step has been taken. Like why ungrouping is necessary." +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,Even more tools and exersices +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,I still think it could improve if we did group work without the template. But I guess that's what we have to do in next session? +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,"I think the exercises are mostly about copy pasting and not so much writing. There us a huge amount of help but I felt like I just looked for the marked words and copy pasted stuff.I am not a beginner at coding so this might be necessary, I just do not think I am thinking when solving the exercises" +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,"I'm getting worried about what I'll do when I don't have you to help me. Maybe show how to solve issues in chat-gpt, google, cheat sheets.I still am confused as to how I'll manage to break down how to build a table myself without copy-pasting the frame for the code." +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,It was perfect +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,More examples/exercises would have been nice to practice +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,No comments +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,None +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,Not any specific. +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing :) +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,Nothing. +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,"There should be ""extra"" assignments for when you are done early" +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,Where do I find more information on descriptive statistics with R? +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,all good +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,it was great +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,maybe making at table that was more usable for what we will actually do with real data +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,nothing +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,really good pacing +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,really nice session +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,"this comment applies to other sessions as well, but I am not too fond of the ""template"" way of doing exercises. I feel I benefit more starting from a blank state, having to recall each step on my own rather than just fill in the blanks" +"Day 3, morning part 2",could be improved for,"would like to know a little more of how to make them nice, or for example turn tables around" +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Anders is really a great instructor/teacherThe exercises are a bit longer wich is nice +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Everything worked nicely +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Excercises +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Good speed. Teacher was good at explaining sufficiently and taking little breaks when writing code. +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,"Good to have tables covered in a seperate section. Makes things less confusing. Again, doing things together in R and afterwards in an exercise, works well." +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,I liked trying more out myself with good help +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,It was again nice with some exercises to do outself. Also this session was very relevant for the data-analysis i am going to do in my own project. +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,It was really nice flow with reading and exercising afterwards +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,It's very useful! +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Most +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Nice tempo of going through exercises. everything is so nicely structured and it is easy to follow. +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Nice tools. Good teacher! +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Nicely paced and interesting +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,Rhythm of the session was good +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,"The ""code along"" was good" +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,The introduction before any coding was clear and the purpose was well stated. The content was very relevant. +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,"Very easy to follow instructions, great explanations and good flow within the module" +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,"Very helpful exercises. Good explanation, nice session that was not rushed." +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,"Very nice session! Nice to reach a point where it gets a little easier to ""code"" and visualizing is nice." +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,all good +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,everything +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,"good examples to make it easier understanding concepts, good time to practice" +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,good pace +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,nice recap +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,nice session +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,nice to learn about tables +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,"the code along seems more easier now. Repeatingthe basic steps of style, render and commit" +"Day 3, morning part 2",worked well for,was really nice +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"A bit more simple datasets to work with. The level of coding done in R by the end of the course is very simple but still difficult, and introducing massive, complex datasets makes the task a bit overwhelming." +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Clearer instructions to get started, like how to import the data and stuff." +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Could have been nice with more group project sessions. e.g. start with going through some functions and make a group exercise afterwards with more specific task e.g. is BMI>25 associated with glucose levels.l It would force us to think more by ourselves and benefit even more from the course. Especially with good instructor to guide +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Ended up spending a lot of time on one problem, so a bit more time would have been good. It did take a while to get familiar with data etc, so maybe smaller datasets with fewer variables would be better. Depends on the goal of the exercise" +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"I would have preferred to have more specific tasks, e.g. make this specific figure based on the dataset. In this way we would spend less time figuring out which figure/table that made sense so make (from a data set we do not know) and more time on actually coding in R. I would as well have liked to have a place to see the solutions (as in the exercises)." +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,I would like to get more strict tasks to actually know what well I could do +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"If we had more time it would be nice to have more exercises spread into different days, so instead of being just one afternoon, having a bit everyday and present a more detailed/complex project" +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Maybe a plenary start with co-coding etc. were everybody made there own repository in Github and also uploaded the data so that all groups were ready to start the fun part (actual project) in R +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Maybe a project where it was needed to collaborate a little more +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Maybe group 1 and 2 could send files to each others and give feedback - suggest changes - as a practice +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Maybe groups cold be slightly bigger so that instructors have more time to assist when issues arise during the project session +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Maybe more concrete instructions on what to do, it was a bit overwhelming as the data sets were quite big." +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Maybe the task could be specific to each one ,or it would kind of puzzled." +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Maybe there should more ""fixed"" tasks to be completed, and also maybe a list with suggested answers. I guess that would just be a summary of the previous answers during the other coding sessions" +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Mention where to get help (what arguments functions need etc.) in the task description of the group project. +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"More clarity on how to do it, breaken down in steps that makes it easier to follow" +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,More time +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,None +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Nothing. +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Perhaps make the tasks a little bit more specific. For example giving a few suggestions on what figures and tables to make. Putting together the code is challenging enough, so it can feel a little bit overwhelming trying to be creative and come up with things." +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Setting up a project took longer time than expected, as we didnt repeat this action like with style-render and commit" +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Some suggestion of graph ? or list of ideas of interesting things to look at so we have nice graph that show something instead of randomly comparing variables (sometimes it showed something nice but sometimes it really didn't ^^) +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"Specific focus points in the dataset might have helped. Some specific variables to manipulate and visualize would have been nice to go on, instead trying a lot of different combinations to see what makes sense." +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,The baseline charachteristics table was surprisingly difficult because of the categorical variables and the group_by function. So nice that we went over this at the very end +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"When downloading and linking the data is very new and something I want to learn, it is hard when only 50% should practice the skill in the exercise?" +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,Would like more emphasis on r -coding than Github +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"it was hard to navigate in Git and Github, but I feel like its something which comes when continuously working with R, Git and Github" +End of course,could be improved for the Group Project s,"we had some issues upon creating the project, as we got some merge issues. I think just one person should create the project, and then the other could access it from github." +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,A bit more structure perhaps. Not everybody were timely and commited to the actual excercise +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,A little more time +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,"At lunch we just networked and talked together, so I think they would be placed better in between two sessions as kind of a break." +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,Funnier topics :D +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,I could have use more time for some sessions to discuss more thoroughly +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,I have nothing. +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,"I think it would be better to specific the task for each one,or it could be alitte puzzled." +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,"I think the group work worked fine, but I think it would be nice if for the lunch and dinner that people spoke more english by default. I am native danish speaker but I noticed a lot of times people would prefer to speak in danish even though they sat next to someone not speaking/understanding dansih" +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,It could maybe have been a little more active +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,It worked well the way it is +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,"Maybe allocated a litte bit more time. But I guess that depends on your group and weather the weather is nice, so you can step outside etc." +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,"Maybe in the beginning of the day in stead of after lunch? So you better know the people you sit next to ""the whole day""-" +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,Maybe some optional afterwards events. +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,More emphasis to do it. often times the persons from my group did not show up. +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,More organised and not just some talking points. +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,More topics for discussion. +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,No ideas +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,Not sure... +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,Nothing +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,Nothing? +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,Questions for day 2 are a bit confusing. It depends a lot on what people is doing in their labs and how do they want to apply collaboration in their groups. +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,The questions were similar to what we were talking about anyway at the coffee machine or lunch or whatever +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,There were a lot of questions on the day 2 to get through +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,Those were fine +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,handout briefer question on paper or by short email to be handhelp for the walk. +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,make it mandatory to go outside +End of course,could be improved for the Networking Activities s,"perhaps it would be nicer if there were certain activities showing what people are working with, so it could be easier to connect with people who are in the same field." +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,All of it - working in pairs and not more people was great +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Applying what we have learned throughout the 3 course days. +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Fun to collaborate +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"Good material, good task descriptions. Two man groups are perfect for this particular type of work." +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Good to have some time to run into problems and try to problem solve +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Hands-on was nice. Easy to get help from instructors. +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Have groups of only two works well. Working in bigger groups would make collaboration hard I think. +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"I initially thought that we would have several atendees in the group, but having only two teammates was great idea to make us do all the work." +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,I liked the size of the group +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,I think 2 by 2 is a good format because a bigger group would have been more difficult to manage +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,I think it was a nice way to wrap up the course +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,It is good to brainstorm with people you meet for the first time +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"It was a fantastic opportunity to try all we have learned throughout the course. Great to test Git and GitHub! We got a lot of errors while trying to make it work, but we finally understood not only why we were getting these errors, but also how to solve them and understand the messages" +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,It was nice to see I can do something on R on my own and also with someone else. Great practise of collaboration +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"It was really nice that we got to work with projects more independently, to practice the things we had learned" +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"It was really nice. Perfect with 2 person groups, both for support and discussion" +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"It was so nice to actually try out everything that we have learned. Difficult, but very good foor learning." +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Just having a lot of time and freedom to explore the code you have learned during the course +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Nice to practice stuf +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"So good to get hands-on experience. Nice that it was in the end - during the course, the guided tasks were perfect. Nice to work two and two, so there was a lot to do for both." +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,"The group division ahead. The possibility to work individual in the group, so you could be at your own skill level without affecting the other person." +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,The instructions were clear for the group project and what to do. +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,To do all steps in a project. +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,Trying on hand the coding and getting help from the instructors +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,collaboration +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,having time to do the task. A partner who was patient. getting help along the way. +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,it was nice to work alone and try to do coding. +End of course,worked well for the Group Project,nice to tie everything together and time set aside for it was just right +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Discussion and the fact that group were randomly define was good +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Good opportunity to exchange views and opininons +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"Good sessions to have, because it ""forces"" networking." +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"Good to have some time to ""formally"" network" +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Having the opportunity to discuss with people I didn't know before +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"I think it was nice that questions were already prepared so there was a topic to discuss about, making it easier to connect and also talk about common grounds leading to new collaborations" +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"I think it's pretry nice for the""Networking Activities""sessions, but it's a little hard for me to code just not to repeat." +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,It was great that we had walking outside with some snacks. +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"It was nice that we were provided some subjects to talk about, as an ice breaker" +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,It was nice to get to know each other. Also nice with kind of af break. Nice with the questions. +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"Nice activity to learn from each other, and find out that you are not alone with your way of working. Plus good time to place it after the lunch" +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Nice conversation starters as a help +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Nice talks with the possibility of sharing experience from previous. +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Nice to get others perspectives and network +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Nice to have us in different group each day to get to know more people +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Nice with some fresh air before more time in front of the computer. Networking. Exchanging experiences with R +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"No forced activities, plenty of time and good conditions to actually meet with other and netword" +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Not being pushed to socialise but rather encourage discussion works well. +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Overall it was great to have these activites and to get to know other atendees. The topics were resonable and relevant. +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,Pre specified questions and time to do it +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,The networking part but also getting time to take a walk etc +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"There was enough time to get in touch and to get to know each other (which field everyone is from etc.), questions were related to course material" +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,To be able to go outside of the room +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,To get assigned topics. To get to choose weather to go out or not. To get assigned different tables. +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,To talk to the other researchers +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"Walk and talk worked great, good way to know your table mates." +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,nice chatting with people +End of course,worked well for the Networking Activities s,"walking outside, nice people, good topics" diff --git a/data/intro/2025-01-14/overview.csv b/data/intro/2025-01-14/overview.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..384dba2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/intro/2025-01-14/overview.csv @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +questions,responses,count +What is your formal position?,PhD student,25 +What is your formal position?,Postdoc,5 +What city do you work in or near?,Aarhus,10 +What city do you work in or near?,Copenhagen,9 +What city do you work in or near?,"Kiel, Germany",1 +What city do you work in or near?,Odense,9 +What city do you work in or near?,Roskilde,1 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [using R?],Beginner,18 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [using R?],Beginner-Intermediate,10 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [using R?],Intermediate,2 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,Excel,6 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"Excel, GraphPad Prism",6 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"Excel, GraphPad Prism, MATLAB",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"Excel, GraphPad Prism, Tiny bit Rstudio",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"Excel, SigmaPlot, GraphPad Prism",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,None,1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,R,1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"SAS/SAS JMP, SPSS, Stata, Excel, Python",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"SPSS, Excel, GraphPad Prism",3 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"SPSS, Excel, GraphPad Prism, Python, Matlab and google sheets",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"SPSS, Excel, SigmaPlot, GraphPad Prism",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"SPSS, GraphPad Prism",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,Stata,1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"Stata, Excel",3 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"Stata, Excel, GraphPad Prism",1 +What programs have you previously used for data analysis?,"Stata, Excel, SigmaPlot, GraphPad Prism",1 +Do you accept the conditions laid out in the Code of Conduct?,Yes,29 +Do you accept the conditions laid out in the Code of Conduct?,"Yes, but i am generally a little conserned about why good behavior in order to finish course is not simply assumed",1 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [data analysis in general?],Beginner,9 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [data analysis in general?],Beginner-Intermediate,11 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [data analysis in general?],Intermediate,7 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [data analysis in general?],Intermediate-Advanced,3 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [programming in general?],Beginner,17 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [programming in general?],Beginner-Intermediate,9 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [programming in general?],Intermediate,3 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [programming in general?],Intermediate-Advanced,1 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [formal version control (e.g. Git)?],Beginner,26 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [formal version control (e.g. Git)?],Beginner-Intermediate,3 +How do you perceive your skill/knowledge of [formal version control (e.g. Git)?],Intermediate,1 +What gender do you identify with?,Man,8 +What gender do you identify with?,Woman,22