Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blastula v0.3.5 Fails Connect Deployment #331

Open
rsh52 opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Blastula v0.3.5 Fails Connect Deployment #331

rsh52 opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@rsh52
Copy link

rsh52 commented May 6, 2024

Issue

Recently we updated from blastula 0.3.3 to 0.3.5, and began running into the following issue when deploying our scheduled mailers to RStudio/Posit Connect:

05/06 18:40:30.716 (GMT)
Error in `handle_setopt()`:
05/06 18:40:30.716 (GMT)
! Unknown option: login_options
05/06 18:40:30.716 (GMT)
Backtrace:
05/06 18:40:30.716 (GMT)
1. cgtmailer::send_email(...)
05/06 18:40:30.716 (GMT)
2. blastula::smtp_send(...)

I'm not able to produce the error locally, but this has failed for multiple colleagues projects when deploying to the Connect servers. Is this by any chance a byproduct of changes introduced in #321 ? I find on using v0.3.3 and passing "" to login_options here I receive a similar handle_setopt() failure.

Session Info

R version 4.4.0 (2024-04-24)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin20
Running under: macOS Ventura 13.6.6

Matrix products: default
BLAS:   /System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Versions/A/libBLAS.dylib 
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-x86_64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib;  LAPACK version 3.12.0

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

time zone: America/New_York
tzcode source: internal

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices datasets  utils     methods   base     

other attached packages:
 [1] ggplot2_3.5.1        cgtmailer_0.0.0.9000 lubridate_1.9.3      RJDBC_0.2-10         DBI_1.2.2           
 [6] glue_1.7.0           pins_1.3.0           blastula_0.3.3       cgtr_0.1.10          rJava_1.0-11        
[11] dplyr_1.1.4          stringr_1.5.1        purrr_1.0.2          rsconnect_1.2.2      connectapi_0.1.3.1  
[16] cli_3.6.2            usethis_2.2.3       

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] gtable_0.3.5      xfun_0.43         tzdb_0.4.0        REDCapR_1.1.0     vctrs_0.6.5       tools_4.4.0      
 [7] generics_0.1.3    curl_5.2.1        parallel_4.4.0    tibble_3.2.1      fansi_1.0.6       pkgconfig_2.0.3  
[13] uuid_1.2-0        lifecycle_1.0.4   farver_2.1.1      compiler_4.4.0    munsell_0.5.1     httpuv_1.6.15    
[19] htmltools_0.5.8.1 yaml_2.3.8        later_1.3.2       pillar_1.9.0      crayon_1.5.2      tidyr_1.3.1      
[25] mime_0.12         commonmark_1.9.1  tidyselect_1.2.1  digest_0.6.35     stringi_1.8.3     labeling_0.4.3   
[31] rprojroot_2.0.4   fastmap_1.1.1     grid_4.4.0        colorspace_2.1-0  magrittr_2.0.3    base64enc_0.1-3  
[37] utf8_1.2.4        readr_2.1.5       withr_3.0.0       scales_1.3.0      promises_1.3.0    rappdirs_0.3.3   
[43] bit64_4.0.5       timechange_0.3.0  rmarkdown_2.26    httr_1.4.7        bit_4.0.5         hms_1.1.3        
[49] shiny_1.8.1.1     evaluate_0.23     knitr_1.46        rlang_1.1.3       Rcpp_1.0.12       xtable_1.8-4     
[55] renv_1.0.7        rstudioapi_0.16.0 vroom_1.6.5       jsonlite_1.8.8    R6_2.5.1          fs_1.6.4   
@rsh52 rsh52 changed the title Blastula v0.3.5 Connect Deployment Issue Blastula v0.3.5 Fails Connect Deployment May 6, 2024
@nealrichardson
Copy link
Contributor

Is it possible that the libcurl version on your server is older than 7.34, which is when the CURLOPT_LOGIN_OPTIONS was added? Googling around, it looks like CentOS 7 ships with 7.29, for example, so it is possible. That's my best guess as to why it would error like that (and why you wouldn't see it locally).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants