Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GPL-546 Display priority of scanned labware #173

Open
2 tasks
KatyTaylor opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Open
2 tasks

GPL-546 Display priority of scanned labware #173

KatyTaylor opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@KatyTaylor
Copy link
Contributor

KatyTaylor commented Jun 22, 2020

User story
Extracted from #149

Who are the primary contacts for this story
Danni, Adam F

Acceptance criteria
After scanning a plate or tube rack into Asset Audits, if it is imported from 'wrangler' or 'lighthouse', I can see its priority. The priority of the labware is calculated as the same as the highest priority of its samples.

  • See priority on Wrangler samples
  • See priority on LH samples (BLOCKED)

Dependencies
This story is related to the following:

@KatyTaylor KatyTaylor added the Enhancement New feature or request label Jun 22, 2020
@rl15 rl15 changed the title GPL-nnn Display priority of scanned labware GPL-546 Display priority of scanned labware Jun 22, 2020
@rl15 rl15 added Heron Priority Flagging and removed Enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 23, 2020
@KatyTaylor KatyTaylor assigned KatyTaylor and unassigned KatyTaylor Jul 1, 2020
@JamesGlover
Copy link
Contributor

JamesGlover commented Jul 2, 2020

Lighthouse: doesn't seem to expose priority information

Lighthouse information comes from the Mongo Database populated by the wrangler, thus any priority information would need to come through the CSV files provided by the labs. This doesn't appear to be the case currently.

@JamesGlover
Copy link
Contributor

JamesGlover commented Jul 3, 2020

Wrangler:

Being selected, but not sent back here. Waiting on sanger/sequencescape#2746

@JamesGlover
Copy link
Contributor

Sequencescape:

Currently not part of the requirements, but would be theoretically possible. Would be another API call on an already slow process though. Theoretically you could unify the wrangler and LH summary imports under a single SS call, but this would tie you to synchronous import.

@JamesGlover
Copy link
Contributor

Popping back in backlog for now

@KatyTaylor KatyTaylor self-assigned this Jul 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants