Y24-299 - Addition of anonymous ids for public data sharing - sample manifest

[KatyTaylor]

User story
As a member of GSU, I would like RVI samples imported via manifest (extracted onsite site) to have an anonymous id added to them, so that when they are shared in public databases, the id does not give any unnecessary information.

Who are the primary contacts for this story
Anna G, Adrianne L

Who is the nominated tester for UAT
Anna G, Ya-Lin H

Acceptance criteria
To be considered successful the solution must allow:

• Samples imported via manifest for RVI study "RVI Program - Bait Capture" have an id created and inserted into the public name field
• Id is created using Baracoda (RVI prefix)

References
This story has a non-blocking relationship with:

• Y24-250 - Addition of anonymous ids for public data sharing - Plate Genie #1851
• Y24-300 - Addition of anonymous ids for public data sharing - existing data #1896

Additional context
Original request from Anna: "GSU would like to apply additional level of security in relation to sample IDs. This will need to be applied to future and all retrospective samples within RVI." (was split into 3 stories).

N.B. Is it worth checking before doing this story if the Sanger Sample Id would be sufficient? Is this used for existing samples in other studies? We discussed using the accession number but think this is not appropriate because it is specific to EBI and this will potentially be released to other databases as well.

[TWJW-SANGER]

I checked with Adrianne, she is happy to use an anonymous ID starting with "RVI":

I know we discussed that the WSI prefix would be used for the Anon ID could it be the RVI one instead. It’s still anon enough not to distinguish location.

[SujitDey2022]

Team Discussion 13Nov2024:

Assumptions:

1. Use of Public Name field in Sequencescape (and MLWH)
2. May need to communicate with Release Team about this new field

[KatyTaylor]

@TWJW-SANGER should this be closed for the same reason as #1851 ?

[TWJW-SANGER]

Yes. Good spot, thank you.