Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Medium field autosuggest from Getty AAT #1494

Closed
apinkney0696 opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Medium field autosuggest from Getty AAT #1494

apinkney0696 opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@apinkney0696
Copy link

Medium field to auto-suggest from the Getty AAT standard vocab.

@jrochkind jrochkind self-assigned this Dec 7, 2021
@jrochkind
Copy link
Contributor

jrochkind commented Dec 7, 2021

Hmm, while Getty AAT was built into the library we use for vocabulary autocomplete... on testing, it's working strangely.

It may not actually be ready for prime-time.

I will investigate more, and reach out to the maintainers of the library.

@jrochkind
Copy link
Contributor

Just for our records in attempts to debug, some technical info on other issues with Getty in the qa gem is in this open ticket on qa here: samvera/questioning_authority#84

@jrochkind
Copy link
Contributor

Filed a ticket on the qa gem at samvera/questioning_authority#346

@jrochkind
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, this isn't going to "just work" for our needs from the existing code library we were working.

We could invest time in "fixing" it for our needs -- ideally contributing our improvements back, but if we can't get agreement with the community on that, alternatively as a custom "adapter" for the qa gem.

It would probably take a few days or a week of work.

We may be able to do it as part of our "samvera maintenance pledge".

For now, I'll move this back to "backlog"!

@jrochkind
Copy link
Contributor

We decided the default QA behavior was good enough, and implemented that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants