You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Allow for LinearSVC (or combined with Nystroem) to be accepted as an SVM estimator by obtaining support indices in the way described above (i.e. using decision_function)
Describe alternatives you've considered
in case data size is too big, undersample the majority class
Additional context
It has taken 10+ hours(and then timed out on VertexAI) when I tried to fit SVMSMOTE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
<--
If you want to propose a new algorithm, please refer first to the scikit-learn inclusion criterion:
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/faq.html#what-are-the-inclusion-criteria-for-new-algorithms
-->
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
The time complexity of SVC on scikit-learn, I believe is
O(n^2)
- so therefore it takes forever to converge if a dataset is larger than 100k. The LinearSVC is more efficient to converge while it does not have_support
attribute exposed, but there is a workaround I believeDescribe the solution you'd like
Allow for LinearSVC (or combined with Nystroem) to be accepted as an SVM estimator by obtaining support indices in the way described above (i.e. using
decision_function
)Describe alternatives you've considered
in case data size is too big, undersample the majority class
Additional context
It has taken 10+ hours(and then timed out on VertexAI) when I tried to fit SVMSMOTE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: