You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I find myself using too much time debugging the paper compilation process. While RST works find, the error messages of the make_paper script are useless in finding the error. For example, I've just used more than 10 minutes to find what
Runaway argument?
{
! Paragraph ended before \hyperlink was complete.
<to be read again>
\par
l.343 ...erence start-string without end-string.}}
! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
Transcript written on paper.log.
means. This is after I've cut the paper file down to 322 lines.
I suggest that you use some time to make the submission process easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I suggest that you use some time to make the submission process easier.
Sorry that you're frustrated! We're all volunteers here, so if you'd like to help us make the paper submission process easier you can always join the team!
Thanks Dillon. One issue I'm using a lot of time on is to find the line where rst syntax errors occur. Do you have any pointers where I can look into that issue?
So the tricky part here is that typically the errors occur after the code has been transpiled to latex. Maybe the easiest thing to do would be to track input line number is the docutils writer, whose class definition can be found here ->
Hi,
I find myself using too much time debugging the paper compilation process. While RST works find, the error messages of the make_paper script are useless in finding the error. For example, I've just used more than 10 minutes to find what
means. This is after I've cut the paper file down to 322 lines.
I suggest that you use some time to make the submission process easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: