-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Terminal Node Constraint for Random Survival Forests #159
Comments
Currently, I think it would make sense to make it configurable by adding it as a hyper-parameter to SurvivalTree. |
I have tested it and there were a few nodes with only censored samples. I think when |
That's a very good point. In this case, it seems to be more complicated, because in sklearn's code the criterion does not determine whether a split is valid or not, but the TreeBuilder and Splitter do. One could misuse |
Good idea. So, I could just create another variable, say |
Is there any parameter/variable which states the minimum number of "uncensored samples" required to be at a leaf node? I think it's called "a minimum of d0 > 0 unique deaths" in the original paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: