Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed unnecessary Cancel ACK's field #4613

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

satveerbrar
Copy link
Contributor

Removed unnecessary ConditionalFields CancelAckToBlockSender and CancelAckToBlockReceiver from LTP segments following RFC 5326 Section 3.2.4.

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5326.html#page-20

fixes #4591

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.69%. Comparing base (a8583a5) to head (9dbd63b).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4613      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.38%   80.69%   -0.70%     
==========================================
  Files         359      359              
  Lines       86029    86029              
==========================================
- Hits        70017    69422     -595     
- Misses      16012    16607     +595     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
scapy/contrib/ltp.py 97.43% <ø> (ø)

... and 22 files with indirect coverage changes

@gpotter2 gpotter2 merged commit 42bc8ea into secdev:master Dec 28, 2024
22 of 24 checks passed
@gpotter2
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR !

@satveerbrar satveerbrar deleted the bugfix/4591 branch January 2, 2025 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LTP protocol definition has two fields that shouldn't be there
2 participants