Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the DownScaleLoss #66

Open
Algolzw opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Question about the DownScaleLoss #66

Algolzw opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Algolzw
Copy link

Algolzw commented Aug 23, 2021

There is no DownScaleLoss in the paper, could we set the param 'lambda_bicubic' to 0?

@sefibk
Copy link
Owner

sefibk commented Aug 23, 2021

It is referred to in sec 4.1:

To provide a reasonable initial starting point, the generator’s output is constrained to be similar to an ideal downscaling (e.g. bicubic) of the input, for the first iterations. Once satisfied, this constraint is discarded.

Note that lambda_bicubic is decreased to 0 relatively fast

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants