You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The most trivial solution to implement over Bitcoin would likely be Lamport signatures. These are also the least amenable to threshold signatures, effectively mandating FHE with a threshold-split signing key. Such a solution would be universal to all cryptocurrencies we wish to integrate however.
With the adoption of covenants, we likely could implement any threshold scheme we want (such as Raccoon's, Mayo/UOV's or a dedicated threshold scheme (not a single-signer scheme with a threshold scheme later produced)). The sole question will be the complexity of building such a script and verifying it on-Bitcoin (along with the on-chain costs). Lamport signatures win in that regard, solely having a horrible off-chain complexity.
Bitcoin will presumably enshrine some post-quantum signature standard, and more-efficient threshold schemes for popular candidates will also likely be posited, giving us some flexibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The most trivial solution to implement over Bitcoin would likely be Lamport signatures. These are also the least amenable to threshold signatures, effectively mandating FHE with a threshold-split signing key. Such a solution would be universal to all cryptocurrencies we wish to integrate however.
With the adoption of covenants, we likely could implement any threshold scheme we want (such as Raccoon's, Mayo/UOV's or a dedicated threshold scheme (not a single-signer scheme with a threshold scheme later produced)). The sole question will be the complexity of building such a script and verifying it on-Bitcoin (along with the on-chain costs). Lamport signatures win in that regard, solely having a horrible off-chain complexity.
Bitcoin will presumably enshrine some post-quantum signature standard, and more-efficient threshold schemes for popular candidates will also likely be posited, giving us some flexibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: