You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since Shadowsocks 2022 is a different protocol that many clients don't support, the standard Shadowsocks server should enable multiuser functionality through a single port. While Xray-core already has a similar feature, it's important for the official project to adopt this capability as well.
Xray-core configuration sample that support similar functionality:
Currently not interested in supporting multi-users for AEAD cipher protocols. Since the AEAD protocol itself doesn’t contain any user informations, so the only way to support multi-user is to “try” decrypt with all configured keys. Quite ugly and inefficient.
Any update on this plz? @zonyitoo I tried to serve same config like
let request_template = AddRequest{server_port: remote_config.server_port,password:"0".to_owned(),method:Some(remote_config.cipher.to_string()),no_delay:None,plugin:None,plugin_opts:None,plugin_mode:None,mode:None,users:None,};
then to update users based on request_template, and apply the changes using manager_client.add().
It'll just destroy current process and create a new one, which is neither efficient nor elegant. Any suggestion?
Since Shadowsocks 2022 is a different protocol that many clients don't support, the standard Shadowsocks server should enable multiuser functionality through a single port. While Xray-core already has a similar feature, it's important for the official project to adopt this capability as well.
Xray-core configuration sample that support similar functionality:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: