-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hazard key values #257
Comments
I've been (manually) adding hazard=electrocution to the likes of power=substation & power=pole. Particularly since relevant signage makes quite clear that there's a “danger of death” to anyone messing with such equipment. Besides populating the values list for the hazard key itself, might I suggest also adding a relevant hazard=* tag to other presets, for consistency. |
@Lee-Carre noted. I'll have a look at expanding the list for next month. Do you know you can create a custom preset on the fly in Vespucci? See http://vespucci.io/help/en/14.0.0%20Release%20notes/#on-the-fly-custom-presets so while not as good as a pre-made preset this can work as a stopgap measure. |
Indeed, thankyou for the reminder 🙂. I've been making use of them, on occasion. Though, as you say, they have their limitations. A local workaround is never as good as addressing the problem upstream (for everyone's benefit). Hence my previous comment 😉. |
Additional traffic hazard values added in b14993b However none of these currently have a wiki page, which iMHO you should add. The question with hazard=electrocution is interesting, because there is currently no documentation of hazard values that are neither traffic related, or areas. I don't see a reason to go through a proposal process for this, but it might be something worth mentioning on the tagging mailing list for feedback. |
Just added wiki pages for frail_pedestrian and road_narrows. |
Nice to see the new proposal for the hazard key being supported in the preset recently. I have a couple of suggestions for extra values for the key, which whilst not in the proposal would be useful to have.
hazard=frail_pedestrians
This is to represent the British sign diagram 544.2 which is a sign for frail or disabled pedestrians likely to be in the road. It is distinguished from sign diagram 544.1 which is a generic pedestrians in road sign and appears outside places like care home and retirement properties. It is to represent the specific hazard that the frail represent in likely being slower-moving and also more likely to be deaf as a post. Same logic as distinguishing between generic pedestrians in the road and children in the road as they represent different types of danger.
hazard=road_narrows
This covers British sign diagrams 516 and 517 which are the road narrowing ahead either on one or both sides. Again it's a hazard not included in the proposal for some reason.
hazard=other
This would cover situations for British sign diagram 562 which is a form of hazard not otherwise covered by a sign. So it's a catch-all to deal with signposted hazards not otherwise represented.
Same icon to be used for the sign in the rendering, just some extra options.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: