You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
After installing fhirclient, the npm audit will report the following:
semver 7.0.0 - 7.5.1
Severity: moderate
semver vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service - GHSA-c2qf-rxjj-qqgw
fix available via npm audit fix
node_modules/@expo/image-utils/node_modules/semver
@expo/image-utils <=0.0.1-canary-20240109-93608d8 || >=0.3.10-alpha.0
Depends on vulnerable versions of semver
node_modules/@expo/image-utils
@expo/cli <=0.0.0-canary-20231123-1b19f96-4 || >=0.0.1-canary-20231125-d600e44
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/image-utils
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/prebuild-config
node_modules/@expo/cli
expo >=50.0.0-alpha.0
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/cli
node_modules/expo
@expo/prebuild-config *
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/image-utils
node_modules/@expo/cli/node_modules/@expo/prebuild-config
5 moderate severity vulnerabilities
To Reproduce
npm install fhirclient
Expected behavior
No vulnerabilities.
Additional context
npm audit has been reporting these vulnerabilities for around a year, I think. I've been waiting for an update to this package, and when I saw an update was made last month, I hoped these would be fixed, but not yet.
I did some investigation in package-lock.json, because the above error messages from npm are not very enlightening. It seems fhirclient depends on isomorphic-webcrypto (not updated for 3 years), which has an optional dependency on "expo-random", which is a deprecated package, and which is likely the cause of the above expo-related problems. Running npm install --no-optional avoids the problem, but I don't know what downsides there are to leaving out all optional packages, and I don't see a way to leave out only expo-random.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
isomorphic-webcrypto was archived earlier this month and appears to be required solely to support Internet Explorer 11 and Safari versions prior to Safari 11. These browsers appear to have a global usage of just above 0.5%. It is, unfortunately, somewhat more likely that a FHIR environment is going to be using IE11 via an embedded MSHTML control in an EHR, but the fact remains, these are old and unsupported browsers.
It may be time to remove isomorphic-webcryptoand use the WebCrypto APIs directly, while telling users who still need IE11 support to use webcrypto-shim.
Describe the bug
After installing fhirclient, the npm audit will report the following:
semver 7.0.0 - 7.5.1
Severity: moderate
semver vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service - GHSA-c2qf-rxjj-qqgw
fix available via
npm audit fix
node_modules/@expo/image-utils/node_modules/semver
@expo/image-utils <=0.0.1-canary-20240109-93608d8 || >=0.3.10-alpha.0
Depends on vulnerable versions of semver
node_modules/@expo/image-utils
@expo/cli <=0.0.0-canary-20231123-1b19f96-4 || >=0.0.1-canary-20231125-d600e44
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/image-utils
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/prebuild-config
node_modules/@expo/cli
expo >=50.0.0-alpha.0
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/cli
node_modules/expo
@expo/prebuild-config *
Depends on vulnerable versions of @expo/image-utils
node_modules/@expo/cli/node_modules/@expo/prebuild-config
5 moderate severity vulnerabilities
To Reproduce
npm install fhirclient
Expected behavior
No vulnerabilities.
Additional context
npm audit has been reporting these vulnerabilities for around a year, I think. I've been waiting for an update to this package, and when I saw an update was made last month, I hoped these would be fixed, but not yet.
I did some investigation in package-lock.json, because the above error messages from npm are not very enlightening. It seems fhirclient depends on isomorphic-webcrypto (not updated for 3 years), which has an optional dependency on "expo-random", which is a deprecated package, and which is likely the cause of the above expo-related problems. Running npm install --no-optional avoids the problem, but I don't know what downsides there are to leaving out all optional packages, and I don't see a way to leave out only expo-random.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: