Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SNOW-936618: Instead of using globals you could attach these stats onto the wrapper itself and then these tests will work concurrently although that might require a context-manager style return to actually return to where you'd check the results #1762

Closed
sfc-gh-aling opened this issue Oct 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

SNOW-936618: Instead of using globals you could attach these stats onto the wrapper itself and then these tests will work concurrently although that might require a context-manager style return to actually return to where you'd check the results #1762

sfc-gh-aling opened this issue Oct 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@sfc-gh-aling

Comments

@sfc-gh-aling
Copy link
Collaborator 

          Instead of using globals you could attach these stats onto the wrapper itself and then these tests will work concurrently although that might require a context-manager style return to actually return to where you'd check the results

Originally posted by @sfc-gh-mkeller in #1750 (comment)
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Instead of using globals you could attach these stats onto the wrapper itself and then these tests will work concurrently although that might require a context-manager style return to actually return to where you'd check the results SNOW-936618: Instead of using globals you could attach these stats onto the wrapper itself and then these tests will work concurrently although that might require a context-manager style return to actually return to where you'd check the results Oct 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sfc-gh-aling sfc-gh-aling

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sfc-gh-aling