Incorrect file extensions published to npm

[NullVoxPopuli]

Just saw

(I'm poking around!) :D

And there is non-JS syntax in here.

I believe that should be compiled away yeah?
(or if the consuming project is responsible for further-compiling the library, the file extension should be jsx, yeah?)

thanks!
(lemme know if I misunderstand something! <3)

[NullVoxPopuli]

omg, I missed that this is all in a string.
everything is fine.

MORE COFFEE

[NullVoxPopuli]

actually no, I think I still have a question about use of jsx in a published package:

This file doesn't need to be jsx tho 🤔

[milomg]

I believe we mark the root as jsx so that vite compiles the package with babel (otherwise we've had problems with it skipping the SolidJS transform for this package)